Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 01-25-2007, 05:22 AM
superpokermon superpokermon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 110
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

[ QUOTE ]
show him you can play for years without losing more than like 10 bucks.


[/ QUOTE ]

This is not a bad idea. I would also point out that the micro stakes tables are the most populated tables at the online cardrooms. Most people playing online poker are just playing by betting a quarter here and there...recreationally. It's ridiculous to outlaw this popular pasttime for everyone when most people are just playing such small limits.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 01-25-2007, 07:23 AM
Richas Richas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the learning curve
Posts: 484
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

Try talking to him about the UK approach of regulating online gambling. How come the UK can regulate but US can't?

http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/Client/index.asp
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 01-25-2007, 06:05 PM
Piece of Cake Piece of Cake is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baking pretty cakes...
Posts: 628
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

[ QUOTE ]
1. Money, money, money. More tax revenue from taxes. More revenue for domestic corporations if they can enter the market, instead of the current situation were nondomestic companies are making a killing off of US consumers.
2. Prohibition doesn't work - see alcohol.
3. Prohibition doesn't solve the problem he is trying to prevent. He doesn't want addicts and underaged playing and doesn't want it to be used for money laundering. Forcing poker underground doesn't stop the abusers, it only stops the law abiding users from playing, domestic companies from profiting, and the US government from effectively taxing and regulating the industry. Legalizing and regulation allows for implentation of means to prevent abuse. The UK sites have done a number of things to this effect.
4. Freedom of discretionary income. If I want to spend $400 on a bottle of wine, or a round of golf, or a game of poker, it's my choice. It's entertainment.
5. Separation of church and state. Gambling is a form of entertainment paid for out of discretionary income. One's religion may prevent them from partaking in the activity, such as it does one from drinking alcohol. But our country was formed on the freedom of religion.

[/ QUOTE ]

Additions/Revision.

Do NOT argue under any circumstances about morality or religion. Because you simply can not sway a personal who takes something for granted on the basis of faith, even in face of the strongest empirical evidence to the contrary. Avoid a religion discussion at all costs. If at all you should use the separation of church and state and freedom of religion as excuses not to evaluate based on that. If online poker is truly bad for the masses, he should be able to come up with non-religious reasons for it.

6. Mention the ridiculous conflicts this bill presents. Live poker is legal but online is not? Online horse betting is legal but online poker is not? Seek an understanding as to why this is so. If he proposes that he thinks all should be illegal, ask him if he thinks outlawing those is a winnable fight. If yes, ask him why his focus is online then? If no, then ask him how he possibly hopes to succeed here.

WRT the conversation on not being able to stop excessive deposits and underage use. I believe these devices are in place in the UK. I know there are deposit limits, and there are certainly age verification technology standards out there. Pushing poker underground eliminates these safeguards that would be standard in a regulated poker community.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 01-25-2007, 11:33 PM
jbrent33 jbrent33 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: About a mile out
Posts: 683
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

Thanks for all of your thoughts, I think a few people have brought up some valid points.

No one else needs to remind me to act civil at dinner with my friend and his in-laws.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 01-25-2007, 11:45 PM
Uglyowl Uglyowl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: They r who we thought they were
Posts: 4,406
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

Current government wants to cut gasoline consumption. No gas is used walking to your computer [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 01-26-2007, 12:05 AM
blutarski blutarski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: iron fist, velvet glove
Posts: 3,654
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

I'm sorry if this was already stated, but here's my two cents:

I would stick with the alcohol and say this: "Since alcohol is such a risk to some people, using UIGEA logic, none of us should have the right to drink."

If he responds by saying: "Well, alchohol is regulated and heavily taxed, etc., to protect people."

You respond by saying: "Exactly, as poker should be."
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 02-02-2007, 01:46 AM
NoTalent NoTalent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Limp folding on the button
Posts: 733
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

Trip report? What did Bachus say? If this hasn't happened yet ask him if you should buy gold.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 02-02-2007, 03:34 PM
whodatdare whodatdare is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: uNL
Posts: 278
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

[ QUOTE ]
Trip report? What did Bachus say? If this hasn't happened yet ask him if you should buy gold.

[/ QUOTE ]


Are you talking about Spenser Bachus?
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 02-02-2007, 03:53 PM
Black_Angler Black_Angler is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 29
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

JBrent,

You are our lobbyist! Go get em! I will donate a dollar to the "Buy a Congressman" foundation [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 02-16-2007, 08:28 PM
Losing all Losing all is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Clavius
Posts: 2,839
Default Re: Dinner With A Congressman

well, wha happen
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.