|
|
#11
01-31-2007, 08:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL 6max: Confused with AQ. Forced to make river decision.
[ QUOTE ]
What about a draw, as FishSticks suggested? ***what about it?*** [/ QUOTE ] You said: [ QUOTE ] If were checking here I think we def need to insta call. The better question is whether or not to lead the river. Like the only real hand I think that would make sense given the way villan played is like Td9x, as I dont really see checking behind the turn w/ a made hand stronger then what we have. [/ QUOTE ] I interpreted this as the only hand villain is likely to have is Td9x, as in he isn't likely to have a draw or any other hand, given his action. I probably misinterpreted, I assume you mean that this is the only likely hand villain can have AND beat us with, which still leaves room for draws ect. Sorry if I misinterpreted, makes more sense now. 
|
|
#12
01-31-2007, 09:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL 6max: Confused with AQ. Forced to make river decision.
I would probably call this. You are inducing a bluff, and then you kinda have to call it. Your hand is probably stronger than he thinks, he could be valuebetting hands you beat or bluff draws that missed. His bet also seems big for a valuebet, but then again it's hard to say. I say call.
|
|
#13
01-31-2007, 09:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL 6max: Confused with AQ. Forced to make river decision.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What about a draw, as FishSticks suggested? ***what about it?*** [/ QUOTE ] You said: [ QUOTE ] If were checking here I think we def need to insta call. The better question is whether or not to lead the river. Like the only real hand I think that would make sense given the way villan played is like Td9x, as I dont really see checking behind the turn w/ a made hand stronger then what we have. [/ QUOTE ] I interpreted this as the only hand villain is likely to have is Td9x, as in he isn't likely to have a draw or any other hand, given his action. I probably misinterpreted, I assume you mean that this is the only likely hand villain can have AND beat us with, which still leaves room for draws ect. Sorry if I misinterpreted, makes more sense now. [/ QUOTE ] no way jose I said [ QUOTE ] 67s got there on the river but he's betting the turn if he had the flush and i don't think 67[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]'s is raising that flop. same thing with 9To, i don't think he has that (pf). [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#16
02-01-2007, 05:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL 6max: Confused with AQ. Forced to make river decision.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What about a draw, as FishSticks suggested? ***what about it?*** [/ QUOTE ] You said: [ QUOTE ] If were checking here I think we def need to insta call. The better question is whether or not to lead the river. Like the only real hand I think that would make sense given the way villan played is like Td9x, as I dont really see checking behind the turn w/ a made hand stronger then what we have. [/ QUOTE ] I interpreted this as the only hand villain is likely to have is Td9x, as in he isn't likely to have a draw or any other hand, given his action. I probably misinterpreted, I assume you mean that this is the only likely hand villain can have AND beat us with, which still leaves room for draws ect. Sorry if I misinterpreted, makes more sense now. [/ QUOTE ] no way jose I said [ QUOTE ] 67s got there on the river but he's betting the turn if he had the flush and i don't think 67[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]'s is raising that flop. same thing with 9To, i don't think he has that (pf). [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Well, I mixed it up, forshure said that. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] I was tired yesterday...
|
|
#17
02-01-2007, 06:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL 6max: Confused with AQ. Forced to make river decision.
meh I never find myself in this situation because Im usually all in on either the flop or turn...
I bet more on the flop (like 12-15) and shove over his raise. As played I call the river expecting to be ahead a lot.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
