CO vs UTG+1 at 6max

[PieterS]

these are my VPIP and PFR from over 50K hands at 100 and 200NL:

UTG:...... 10.7 / 10.4 (9BB/100)
UTG+1:.. 12.5 / 11.3 (11BB/100)
CO:........ 20.0 / 18.2 (19BB/100)
BUTTON:. 26.3 / 22.9 (19BB/100)
SB:......... 23.2 / 12.0 (-8BB/100)
BB:......... 12.6 / 8.8 (-12BB/100)

As you see there is a really large gap.
Is this gap strangely large, or does it make sense?

If I had to play looser, what hands should I add in UTG+1?

Anything otherwise to add about these stats? Maybe post yours? (mainly interested in winning players at 200NL obviously [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img])

[BobAllinSki]

Fold more on the button, call more UTG.

On more serious note thats seriously strange, I dont have stats on me but I'm about the same in terms of VPIP & PFR in ealry position and win significantly less but am looser in late position and win about the same. 19bb/100 is pretty impresive utg.

[BobAllinSki]

Just to add, you could loosen up a bit on the button, but your ptbb their isnt bad, its just in early position they are seriosly good. I definately wouldnt loosen up UTG, your high ptbb is probably down partly to solid hand selection.

[PieterS]

Wow, i mixed up the PTBB/100 obviously [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

fixed now i hope

[Freelancer]

Looks fairly standard to me, what are your overall stats?

From memory (cant access PT right now);
UTG: 16/16
UTG+1: 20/18
CO: 26/24
BTN: 32/30 or so (not sure about co/btn)

I run on average something like 23/20, but some people have me in there database as 19/16 and others as 32/25. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[PieterS]

overal stats are 19/16 with 6BB/100