#1
|
|||
|
|||
A somewhat deep stacked decision
I was going through my notes and I forgot to post this hand.
Bay101 $40 rebuy from a while ago. Right after the rebuy period, so stacks are still sorta deep. Players are still pretty terrible though. I have been crazy during the rebuy period going all in preflop w/out looking a few times after a few allins. I have a stack of 25k. Blinds are 100-200 no antes. Button villian is loose-passive. Likes to make bad flop calls in multiway hands w/ overcards and gives up on the turn when he doesn't hit. A raise from him preflop means two playable cards, a bet from him postflop means TP or better. A call means he hasn't folded yet. He also never believes me. Two limpers in EP/MP and I get KK in the CO and peek left at the villian on the button. He looks perky, so I take a chance and limp behind. He raises to 1k (he has ~28k), bb folds, one EP limper calls and it's on me. I raise to 3500. He instacalls and limper looks bewildered and finally folds. 8300 in the pot and I have 21.5k left. Flop is Q85r. I lead for 6k and he quietly calls somewhat quickly. 20k in the pot. Turn is a duece because the turn is always a duece on 2+2. I have 15k left...what's my plan? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A somewhat deep stacked decision
Push...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A somewhat deep stacked decision
Also, I didn't know that Bay101 has NL games. I thought they were spread limit.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A somewhat deep stacked decision
I see no need to get fancy here, as he probably has a hand like AQ (this and QQ seem to be the only hands that can call the flop so quickly).
I shove the turn, and expect to win a nice pot (whether or not I'm called). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A somewhat deep stacked decision
[ QUOTE ]
Also, I didn't know that Bay101 has NL games. I thought they were spread limit. [/ QUOTE ] They're called "Spread Limit", but the spread is wide enough to put a player all-in at any given point in time. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A somewhat deep stacked decision
I think a loose passive calls w/ AQ, 88, 55 pre. He is content to let you bet his set of Qs. I would rather be weak-tight and c/f turn than call off 75bb w/overpair. I do not see him floating JJ here with your 3bet preflop.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A somewhat deep stacked decision
If he never believes you, you can check the turn because he'll call a river push with JJ but not a turn push.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A somewhat deep stacked decision
He's a calling station and your description suggests he's not particularly good, especially with deep stacks. I figure this means he's calling with a number of worse hands. As such, I'm felting KK here. Pushing the turn seems like the most standard, straightforward way to accomplish it.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A somewhat deep stacked decision
[ QUOTE ]
I think a loose passive calls w/ AQ, 88, 55 pre. He is content to let you bet his set of Qs. I would rather be weak-tight and c/f turn than call off 75bb w/overpair. I do not see him floating JJ here with your 3bet preflop. [/ QUOTE ] This defies everything about villain as he's described. Soss, I think a push is fine, but the board is super dry, so I kinda like a check, because it gives him a better chance to commit with a worse hand. I'm not folding. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A somewhat deep stacked decision
Check, planning to c/c, shove river if he checks behind. And you cannot get away from this hand against the described villain unless he has a massive tell.
Purpose of the check is so to increase likelihood he calls w/ any pair he called flop w/. |
|
|