#1
|
|||
|
|||
Session Review #1: Pocket Pairs
PokerStars Game #8075042904: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($0.25/$0.50) - 2007/01/22 - 20:45:08 (ET)
Table 'Daphne IV' 9-max Seat #9 is the button Seat 1: Berge20 ($60.50 in chips) Seat 2: Qazpur ($22.05 in chips) Seat 3: twopistacios ($34.85 in chips) Seat 4: tokeweed ($66.20 in chips) Seat 5: jgoddensa ($48.75 in chips) Seat 6: AlexAllen02 ($49.05 in chips) Seat 7: onegoodplaya ($57.85 in chips) Seat 9: RyfeEnder ($99.15 in chips) Berge20: posts small blind $0.25 Qazpur: posts big blind $0.50 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Berge20 [6c 6s] twopistacios: folds tokeweed: folds jgoddensa: folds AlexAllen02: folds onegoodplaya: folds RyfeEnder: raises $1.50 to $2 Berge20: raises $5 to $7 We'll get into the rest of the hand a little later, but obviously, the reraise is interesting. First of all, Berge, what kind of read do you have on the initial raiser? Is reraising a strong enough play here? What were your reasons behind the reraise? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Session Review #1: Pocket Pairs
I like this fine, although this is about the only time I'd RR 22-88. The button raise could mean anything and 6 6 isn't exactly the hand you want to play OOP too often in a HU pot. Also, you can't really play for set value as button won't have a strong enough hand often enough.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Session Review #1: Pocket Pairs
|
|
|