Maximum Juice

[kioshk]

Desperate times call for desperate measures. I'm surprised that so many poker players are so willing to deposit even when it means paying 3%, 5%, 6%, on up.

What's the most you'd be willing to pay for a convenient, sure method of funding your online poker account? Would anyone pay over 10%?

[Lucky]

my site already charges me 5%. They call it the rake.

[kioshk]

[ QUOTE ]
my site already charges me 5%. They call it the rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I kinda think rake is plenty.

[kioshk]

[ QUOTE ]
i haven't made a deposit in two years, when all of this crap is sorted out i can't imagine i'll have to deposit more than once, so the transaction fee's are rather irrelvant really, so long as its free to go from Funding Source to Poker Room and then back to Funding Source

[/ QUOTE ]

Interesting. So funding source can charge you 5% in and then 5% out, and you're fine with that? Wow.

[Route66]

[ QUOTE ]
So funding source can charge you 5% in and then 5% out, and you're fine with that? Wow.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought most of the charges were for loading the funding source... if there are charges for getting money out, couldn't we just use the source to load and withdraw by check directly from the poker room?

[kioshk]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So funding source can charge you 5% in and then 5% out, and you're fine with that? Wow.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought most of the charges were for loading the funding source... if there are charges for getting money out, couldn't we just use the source to load and withdraw by check directly from the poker room?

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess you can withdraw by check directly from the poker room now, no charge. How's that working? And how will that be working 6 months from now?

In theory, you can still get your Neteller money now, no extra charge. How's that working?

This is a very fluid situation. The cost of poker money is going up, even as we speak. My question was(is), how much juice is too much?

[edfurlong]

You should make a pole.

[kioshk]

A juice-filled response!