Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2007, 04:59 PM
Chiche Chiche is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17
Default Top pair no kicker

CO is new to the table
BT is 30/7/45

Limit Holdem Ring game
Limit: $0.50/$1
5 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is BB with 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
UTG, folds, CO (poster) checks, Button calls, SB folds, Hero checks.

Flop: J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (3.5SB, 3 players)
Hero checks, CO checks, <font color="#cc0000">Button bets</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises</font>, CO calls, Button calls.

Turn: Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (4.75BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, CO checks, <font color="#cc0000">Button bets</font>, Hero calls, CO calls.

River: 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (7.75BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, CO checks, <font color="#cc0000">Button bets</font>, Hero ???

CO seems to be slow playing. Do you consider folding the turn?

Every post appreciated
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-24-2007, 05:03 PM
danzasmack danzasmack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DYNAMO HARSHBART
Posts: 7,370
Default Re: Top pair no kicker

why did you check the turn?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-24-2007, 05:26 PM
jstill jstill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: downtown portsmouth
Posts: 3,641
Default Re: Top pair no kicker

at first i said id check/fold the turn after COs flop cold call since he wont do that with KQ or QJ if hes normal and the only worse hand he should cold call 2 on the flop with T9 just got there.

Then i realized these are all limpers and posters and u have no read at all yet on CO other than he checked his option preflop ( so many Aces are discounted) so Id probably just bet bet.

As played i think u can fold the river though if button is mostly loose passive, its a split at best. what was his AF?

ps why does CO appear to be slowplaying? you have no idea how he plays yet and if he had a big hand he would probably check-raise the turn almost always.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-24-2007, 05:35 PM
Chiche Chiche is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17
Default Re: Top pair no kicker

I would have bet if I´d succed to push out the CO on the flop. What I was actually considering a that moment was to check-fold a bet from the CO if the BT have called, but CO didn´t bet.

So the CO check and BT bets... But now I´ve to put him on a better hand than mine when he bets. So I just called...

The more I write the more I regret my play... completely missplayed the turn, right?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-24-2007, 05:54 PM
Chiche Chiche is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17
Default Re: Top pair no kicker

jstill

BT agression factor is 0.66. So yes, you are right he is loose passive and I shoud have folded the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-24-2007, 06:29 PM
TonyDanza TonyDanza is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cleaning House
Posts: 520
Default Re: Top pair no kicker

[ QUOTE ]
at first i said id check/fold the turn after COs flop cold call since he wont do that with KQ or QJ if hes normal and the only worse hand he should cold call 2 on the flop with T9 just got there.

[/ QUOTE ]

He could also be calling two cold with QT.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-25-2007, 02:48 AM
goofball goofball is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Who wrote \'help I\'m a bug\' on my letter to grandma?
Posts: 6,463
Default Re: Top pair no kicker

[ QUOTE ]
why did you check the turn?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2007, 03:37 AM
NinaWilliams NinaWilliams is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Broken-hearted, Battle-scarred
Posts: 2,008
Default Re: Top pair no kicker

[ QUOTE ]
I would have bet if I´d succed to push out the CO on the flop. What I was actually considering a that moment was to check-fold a bet from the CO if the BT have called, but CO didn´t bet.

So the CO check and BT bets... But now I´ve to put him on a better hand than mine when he bets. So I just called...

The more I write the more I regret my play... completely missplayed the turn, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

The pot is small, so driving out CO isnt a major concern. I think the best course of action is bet/bet/bet. I also see no reason to put button on a better hand on the turn. This could easily be a J or an 8.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-25-2007, 03:57 AM
bluf8u bluf8u is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 116
Default Re: Top pair no kicker

[ QUOTE ]

I think the best course of action is bet/bet/bet.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-25-2007, 02:27 PM
akvsaq akvsaq is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 290
Default Re: Top pair no kicker

I don't like any of this. This is a small pot. How often do you think the button has nothing? I would guess A LOT!
I like the play of just CALLING the flop bet. The CO is getting incorrect odds to call anyway. You gain more by allowing BTN to bluff and and at the same time NOT get outplayed.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.