Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 01-23-2007, 03:31 AM
Mitch Evans Mitch Evans is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,102
Default Re: A realistic workaround.

[ QUOTE ]
You are implying that this is money laundering. It is not.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are implying it's money laundering when you use words like, "untraceable" or "workaround" etc. I'm not implying it's money laundering- I’m saying it flat out.

You are using a third party that is selling items and giving the cash of that sale to another party on your behalf. This is all done in an attempt to deceive the US government into believing you are buying a good or service and not transferring money internationally. I fail to see how this could be construed as anything but laundering, especially through the eyes of the government.


[ QUOTE ]
Phone cards for a deposit option was used on most major sites up until some time last year.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this the reason why you don't think it's money laundering, because this option was available in the past?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.