Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2007, 05:04 AM
EasilyConfused EasilyConfused is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 56
Default Endgame -- I Suck

I just started playing $20 NL 1-table tourneys on Stars about a month ago after a couple years as a moderate winner in MTTs and ring games.

I've now played a little over 200 sit-&-gos, and I'm down $80. I have more than my share of 2nd & 3rd place finishes, but not nearly enough wins. I'm sure I'm doing something wrong when I get heads-up, but I don't know what.

Can someone kindly point me to a few previous helpful threads on endgame strategy so I can brush up?

I apologize if this is in the FAQ. If it is, I didn't see it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2007, 12:29 PM
lamma888 lamma888 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 34
Default Re: Endgame -- I Suck

Get one of the end game software in the FAQ to assist you if it's end game problem.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-19-2007, 01:13 PM
bluefeet bluefeet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Galapagos Islands of course
Posts: 5,032
Default Re: Endgame -- I Suck

a bit early to sweat your finish distro. 200 games isn't much. push/call more? push/call less? hard telling of course. feel free to post some specific hands.

when to push/call (or when not to) is of course the important question. see the faq for links to "ICM"...and the 2nd sticky for links to software that helps solidify these concepts for you - as well as improve your intuition at game time.

as for posts? searching subject only for things like "push", "call", "ITM", etc. should yield you some specific hands -- where the specifics are COMPLETELY necessary to have before you when trying to get your hands around the end-game stuff. you're more than welcome to bump threads with questions regarding these specifics.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2007, 01:17 PM
AMT AMT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Watching my baby grinders take your lunch money
Posts: 9,771
Default Re: Endgame -- I Suck

im down 50 buy ins over that span of time and im not overly concerned with any aspect of my SNG game...if anything you need a bigger sample. id also recommend reading up on the nash equilibrium in SNGPT (id recommend buying sngpt, if that wasnt directly inferred). post some hands, but really reading posts is how i got to be a better STTer. gl


btw with such high variance over big samples you can expect much, much worse runs than -4 buy ins...just putting that out there, its better that you know sooner
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-19-2007, 03:09 PM
EasilyConfused EasilyConfused is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 56
Default Re: Endgame -- I Suck

Yeah, I'm used to swings, but since I'm new at STTs and things have been going badly heads-up, I thought I'd better check into it.

Thanks for the encouragement and the search tips.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-19-2007, 03:15 PM
DevinLake DevinLake is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,022
Default Re: Endgame -- I Suck

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I'm used to swings, but since I'm new at STTs and things have been going badly heads-up, I thought I'd better check into it.

Thanks for the encouragement and the search tips.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are new to sngs, which means you inevitably have leaks. You are right to come looking for answers.

Like others have said, look into the FAQ to learn ICM. You may not be doing a good job gathering chips to give your self much of a chance heads up. Or, you may just be experience variance. Who knows...but keep looking for ways to improve.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-19-2007, 03:52 PM
dpbuck dpbuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Trying not to suck so much...
Posts: 293
Default Re: Endgame -- I Suck

[ QUOTE ]
Like others have said, look into the FAQ to learn ICM. You may not be doing a good job gathering chips to give your self much of a chance heads up. Or, you may just be experience variance. Who knows...but keep looking for ways to improve.

[/ QUOTE ]
Not meaning to piggyback on your thread, but I'm also a n00b, and I am having issues where more often than not I am getting to the bubble (4 or 5 left) with a short stack, leaving myself in situations where I'm pushing light to try and double up and get in the money. Looking at my numbers (small size - < 100 SNGs) I have more 4ths and 5ths than all other spots combined. Is that standard, or am I playing too tight early? Have any tips for that?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-19-2007, 03:57 PM
Hollandicus Hollandicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Plan3t Gong Poker Blog
Posts: 184
Default Re: Endgame -- I Suck

4ths and 5ths can be standard enough as long as they are taking the place of the 7/8/9th rather than the ITM spots. Its a common issue with the super-tight then pushbot style, maybe you should check up to make sure you are not waiting *too* long to start pushing... post a few hands.

Cheers, Mark
http://plan3tgongpoker.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-19-2007, 04:26 PM
DevinLake DevinLake is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,022
Default Re: Endgame -- I Suck

Every one's distribution will look a little different. However, if I recall correctly, I had a lot more 5ths than any other position except maybe firsts. Then a drastic decrease in fourths, and then increasing ITM. Ie. 1>2>3>4<5. Fourths may have been higher than 3rds.

I refuse to look at my sng database to confirm. The thought of playing a sng still makes me cringe.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.