Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 01-10-2007, 02:03 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Spewing since 2004.
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Coughlin stays. It's official.

[/ QUOTE ]

ESPN Link

Just the link.

[/ QUOTE ]

Like I said yesterday, pretty obvious that this was coming.

It must be blowing the guy's mind who called me a retard how the Giants could get this done without a GM. [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah, I still think you're a retard. There's a big difference between not doing anything differently without a GM and changing a lot of things with a GM.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 01-10-2007, 02:21 PM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not using the back button
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

I think its pretty clear that the Giants are keeping Caughlin because they don't like any of the available options. Keeping him for another year seems like they're hoping to land Cowher or Parcells next year.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-10-2007, 02:26 PM
Needle77 Needle77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: \"Needle Princip\" - Cody
Posts: 7,062
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

I think if they had wanted Parcells they would have given him the GM job. That way, if Coughlin is to be fired next season they could fill in the spot with Parcells rather easily.

I think they are looking at John Fox. But Cowher could be another viable option for them.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-10-2007, 02:34 PM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not using the back button
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

I didn't really mean to limit it to just Cowher and Parcells, just using them as examples. I think they'll want a proven NFL coach and there aren't really any of those available right now.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 01-10-2007, 04:35 PM
nyc999 nyc999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,195
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I really wonder if alot of Eli's development gets slowed down because of Tiki's success. Knowing you can lean on a player since your first start might have given him to much of a crutch.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would think the presence of a strong running game should have helped his development, not hindered it. That seems more logical than the opposite.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would think so. I also think if the Giants lack a strong running game next year leaving defenses to focus on Eli, the Giants will be in trouble. His poor decisions will be even more magnified.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 01-10-2007, 04:44 PM
JordanIB JordanIB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,167
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

[ QUOTE ]
I really wonder if alot of Eli's development gets slowed down because of Tiki's success. Knowing you can lean on a player since your first start might have given him to much of a crutch.

Being a Jags fan I saw this when Jimmy Smith was on the team. The other recievers did not step up because they knew Jimmy was there. Once he retired, the other guys starting stepping up.

Eli might be better without Tiki because that safety valve is gone. It's just an idea. I think Eli will have his best year this upcoming season. Of course the coaches have to show confidence in him for next season, alot more deep routes, getting recievers more involved, ect.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can respect the argument, but we'll just have to agree to disagree. I feel like you're complicating a very simple situation in trying to make the case that when he's asked to do more, he'll be better.

Early returns have shown that when Eli is asked to do something, Eli struggles, Eli heaves balls, Eli throws off his back foot, Eli throws into triple coverage, Eli looks lost, Eli returns to sideline with blank "duh" look on his face.

I'm already beginning to fear how worse it'll become once MORE is asked of him next year.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 01-11-2007, 01:04 PM
Needle77 Needle77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: \"Needle Princip\" - Cody
Posts: 7,062
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

In the Star Ledger today it is saying that the Jerry Reese is going to be the GM. I can't find a link but there is a column about it in the paper.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 01-11-2007, 07:40 PM
niss niss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: yankee the wankee?
Posts: 4,489
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

Giants fire Tim Lewis

Hallelujah.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 01-11-2007, 07:42 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

Bill Belicheck couldn't've made that defense good. Honestly - our corners are HORRIBLE.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 01-11-2007, 08:33 PM
camerondiggs camerondiggs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 220
Default Re: NYG offseason thread

[ QUOTE ]
Bill Belicheck couldn't've made that defense good. Honestly - our corners are HORRIBLE.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just make that the secondary in general.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.