Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2007, 04:54 PM
schundler schundler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LISTEN BUCKO
Posts: 1,811
Default QQ 200nl gambool or no?

Villian 20/12

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

BB ($281.10)
UTG ($100.20)
MP ($80)
CO ($109.50)
Hero ($299.40)
SB ($228.10)

Preflop: Hero is Button with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $8</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $24</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $109.5</font>, Hero folds.

Final Pot: $136.50
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2007, 04:58 PM
*** *** is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: * * *
Posts: 1,115
Default Re: QQ 200nl gambool or no?

Edit: I totally missed stack sizes. Snap call please.

My original advice (for a 100bb+ game) is below:
I don't gamble in situations like this without a read. Know that some players, even with stats like this, will push with AK or some random hand knowing that you will often fold. The problem is that the random hand doesn't normally happen often enough to make up for when you are flipping or dominated.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2007, 04:58 PM
FishRoller FishRoller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 179
Default Re: QQ 200nl gambool or no?

He's a shortdonk- i probably call this all day i even c TT or JJ, AQs, even AJs. U cant assume he has the stone nuts every time if he's buying in short (meaning he's prob an idiot), and he could think u were repoppingn light on button taking advantage of his short stack.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2007, 05:11 PM
Crosby Crosby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL US
Posts: 138
Default Re: QQ 200nl gambool or no?

Without more detailed information, I autocall this. Did you have his att to steal %? That would help you determine how much he raises in this spot. If he's a 20/12 over a ton of hands and his att to steal is 50, maybe that can lower his range enough here to make a fold tempting. Dunno, I'd just always call anyway getting 134-86. He's gotta have worse pairs and especially AK enough with those odds I'd think.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2007, 05:13 PM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: QQ 200nl gambool or no?

I fold JJ but probably call QQ. I don't think folding is too bad though tbh.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2007, 05:21 PM
Praetor Praetor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,248
Default Re: QQ 200nl gambool or no?

i def call
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2007, 05:23 PM
Suigin406 Suigin406 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: fire isiah and minaya
Posts: 8,613
Default Re: QQ 200nl gambool or no?

[ QUOTE ]
i def call

[/ QUOTE ]

i think he does this enough with AK to warrant this call...he could even have an underpair and was just hoping u might fold or thinking a race...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2007, 05:25 PM
KLJ KLJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ucla
Posts: 2,890
Default Re: QQ 200nl gambool or no?

wow call
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2007, 05:36 PM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: QQ 200nl gambool or no?

Through experience this is nearly always JJ+, AK. Occasionally AQ but not that often. It's not an instacall like most make out.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-11-2007, 05:41 PM
Praetor Praetor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,248
Default Re: QQ 200nl gambool or no?

I disagree, I think you see all pairs above 88, with the range skewed towards higher pairs obv, I also think AQ is only slightly less likely than AK, and AJ is possible
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.