#1
|
|||
|
|||
Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
Villain here is like 30/24 (a decent amount of shorthanded in here so not awful actually) aggro postflop as well. Pretty much LAG TAG, tended to spew a bit but rarely vs me. He views me as very tight I'm sure. Is this too passive? Better plan?
Thanks, DeathDonkey Party Poker 100.00/200.00 Hold'em <font color="#0000FF">(8 handed)</font> link Preflop: Hero is CO with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button caps</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP calls, Hero calls. Flop: (13.50 SB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> MP checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises</font>, MP folds, Hero calls. Turn: (8.75 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks intending to call down... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
What do you think of a check raise and folding to a 3 bet?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
I think I would have to bet if he checked the turn behind.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
[ QUOTE ]
I think I would have to bet if he checked the turn behind. [/ QUOTE ] No. If he checks the turn, he should checkraise the river. Calling the flop, checking the turn, checking the river shows such extreme weakness that the villain will bet ANY hand on the river. Josh |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think I would have to bet if he checked the turn behind. [/ QUOTE ] No. If he checks the turn, he should checkraise the river. Calling the flop, checking the turn, checking the river shows such extreme weakness that the villain will bet ANY hand on the river. Josh [/ QUOTE ] You think he would bet QQ? JJ? I don't see the value in the c-raise.. would he call with those hands? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
i think you should 3 bet the flop, because you will often still get called down if he has something like TT-QQ. this is better than calling the flop raise and check-calling down (your plan) b/c you gain more value, and better than cr'ing the turn b/c he can get away from those hands.
if he were to cap the flop i would plan on just calling down. if the just called the flop 3-bet and popped you again on the turn, i would cry-call down b/c from your description he seems pretty aggro. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think I would have to bet if he checked the turn behind. [/ QUOTE ] No. If he checks the turn, he should checkraise the river. Calling the flop, checking the turn, checking the river shows such extreme weakness that the villain will bet ANY hand on the river. Josh [/ QUOTE ] You think he would bet QQ? JJ? I don't see the value in the c-raise.. would he call with those hands? [/ QUOTE ] I did it here and got called by KK. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
I think you are still ahead here, only 4 hand combos beat you. You should probably try to get more money in at some point, perhaps 3 bet the flop and lead the turn so villain doesn't check behind.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
You labeled this guy as TAG... and the difference between a 10/20 TAG and a 100/200 semi-lag...WOW
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too passive with TPTK? - 100/200
i think you should 3-bet the flop or c/r the turn, i would call down any further aggression from there, most of these guys can have a very wide variety of holdings in this spot, and my guess is that if he has as much as an ace, hell never fold it
|
|
|