#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
cowboys win this easily.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
SEA -1 -110 at pinny. just bet heavy on it. i guess i'm a homer. this will be the first football game i've watched all year. go hawks!
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
BoDog is known for dealing two sets of lines. One set of lines that are fair. The other set of lines are used to trap 'squares' or newer, unsophisticated clients. I am not sure, but I think they start everyone off at the 'square' line and then move them to the fair line if they don't act like a square.
What you should do is compare Bodog's lines to other sportsbooks, like pinnaclesports.com. And then only bet at Bodog if they are close to fair or offer a better line. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
fezzik has dallas but at +3
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
Seahawks win by 10.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
[ QUOTE ]
SEA -1 -110 at pinny. just bet heavy on it. i guess i'm a homer. this will be the first football game i've watched all year. go hawks! [/ QUOTE ] Just took SEA ML at -111 (effectively the same thing in the postseason). edit: Mansion Exchange double edit: ignore that one part, it's actually better |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
I grabbed -1 -112. Regardless of what happens, there's value at that price.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
they need to start scoring points to get that o46.5
return for TD is nice only 17 more to go in 20 mins |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
Looks like Seahawks win 21-20. What a choke by Dallas with the safety and the botched field goal attempt. Terrell Owens, as usual, is clutch when it truly matters with two receptions for 26 yards. I am sure Dallas is regretting that extra baggage now!
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (-3) v. DAL
betting sports is stupid...i made a large bet on dallas...you cannot beat sports, only poker.
|
|
|