Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2007, 01:26 AM
Poker Gestalt Poker Gestalt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Default QTo in LP vs. 100% vp$ip

villain has played every hand since he sat.. posted UTG, cold calling 3 bets, showing down hands like J2o calling down with A high on a QT8J7 board etc. 25 hand sample.

Do I iso raise this?

Preflop: Hero is Button with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls, <font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, Hero...


at what point would i NOT want to iso raise if your answer is yes? Q9o? J7s?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2007, 01:36 AM
MrWookie MrWookie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Treating my drinking problem
Posts: 17,411
Default Re: QTo in LP vs. 100% vp$ip

I cannot answer this until you tell me about the blinds, but I tend to raise QT. Lower and I def. need a read on the blinds.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2007, 01:48 AM
Poker Gestalt Poker Gestalt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Default Re: QTo in LP vs. 100% vp$ip

SB is 53/3/.4
BB is 66/4/.4
(both have played the same amount of hands as villain at this point)

I think im going to know the responce on this one but how low should there stats be before i should consider raiseing. Oh and then would you suggest i call instead or just muck it.

EDIT: what is one of the two had a low vpip but the other lower?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2007, 01:55 AM
MrWookie MrWookie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Treating my drinking problem
Posts: 17,411
Default Re: QTo in LP vs. 100% vp$ip

Against blinds like that, then QTo is the weakest offsuit hand I'll raise. I'll raise JTs and 88, maybe 77. I'll limp all kinds of crap. Basically, I'm assuming that I'm not going to win this hand by folding everyone.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2007, 02:03 AM
Poker Gestalt Poker Gestalt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Default Re: QTo in LP vs. 100% vp$ip

Cool, Thx man.

On a sort of dif note:

Do those hands apply for stealing the blinds too. Do you have any links that refer to blind stealing in a loose passive game? or advice in general i guess. SSHE doesnt mention it (i dont think??)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2007, 02:07 AM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: .25/.50 6max - stars
Posts: 5,289
Default Re: QTo in LP vs. 100% vp$ip

[ QUOTE ]
Oh and then would you suggest i call instead or just muck it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Never fold any broadway anything against this opposition ever. You could probably limp any 2 cards 9 or higher. I'd probably even play any suited cards 7 or higher (yes that includes Q7s).

If they were tighter you should now raise all of those hands except the ones with crappy showdown value like the aformentioned Q7s.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2007, 05:46 AM
goofball goofball is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Who wrote \'help I\'m a bug\' on my letter to grandma?
Posts: 6,463
Default Re: QTo in LP vs. 100% vp$ip

Yeah I think it's a raise.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.