Another TPTK vs maniac

[dankus]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
too fancy and unecessary

[/ QUOTE ]
? It's the basic stack-a-donk line

[/ QUOTE ]

Didn't he stack him this way?

[Shaddux]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
too fancy and unecessary

[/ QUOTE ]
? It's the basic stack-a-donk line

[/ QUOTE ]

Didn't he stack him this way?

[/ QUOTE ]
obv...but usually it is the other way around

the fact that OP lost is irrelevent. Both lines suggested (Unknown's and mine) result in him losing anyways.

[dankus]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
too fancy and unecessary

[/ QUOTE ]
? It's the basic stack-a-donk line

[/ QUOTE ]

Didn't he stack him this way?

[/ QUOTE ]
obv...but usually it is the other way around

the fact that OP lost is irrelevent. Both lines suggested (Unknown's and mine) result in him losing anyways.

[/ QUOTE ]

The way the hand is played and the way the opponent has been described, I would feel more comfortable with the hand getting it on the flop. There are eighteen cards that, if they came, would make it difficult for me to check raise all-in on the turn.

By simply calling, I'm giving the opponent the opportunity to hit a card that could improve his hand. At this point, I'm fairly confident in my hand, and I would be willing to raise him all in on the flop, to get the opponent to make the incorrect choice.

[Shaddux]

[ QUOTE ]
to get the opponent to make the incorrect choice

[/ QUOTE ]
It seemed to me like 3betting AI would force him to make the correct choice more often than the incorrect choice. That was the only reason i suggested the stackadonk on the turn.

If you disagree, then getting it AI on the flop is probably the best.

[corsakh]

Ok, say I had no read. The sample is too small. Against an unknown loose aggressive player in a 3 handed game is this a good line to take?

[corsakh]

I've noticed at this level players are much more inclined to call 3bets on the flop rather than a turn lead after a reraise.