#181
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
[ QUOTE ]
I think the 2 was fine because Iowa's FG kicker is so bad that two FGs by the Hawkeyes are not a likely outcome. The gain from 5 to 7 is huge compared to the loss from 6 to 5 there. [/ QUOTE ] Good point. This is turning into a fun game, as I don't care about either team. |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
the lack of a holding call on that 3rd and 12 is inexcusable....the DE was held like crazy
|
#183
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
Does anyone care to play defense in this game???
|
#184
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
Wow what a whiff on the holding call on the right tackle for Iowa. Wide open huge on the D-end. Lame.
|
#185
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
Wow, that was a pretty sick cut right there. That was all the RB and backside of the line, the front side got owned there.
|
#186
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
let's see if Mack Brown stays aggressive on offense now
|
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
3rd time this game McCoy has thrown short of the first...not sure if that is him or the receiver
guess two FGs for Iowa is very possible...LOL |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
WHY?????
|
#189
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
MT2R,
If you get a chance go back to that play where McCoy threw short and see if there was a deeper route beyond the first down marker. I think he was forced to checkdown, but I'm not sure. I'm just curious. |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAA Bowl Thread
there was a deeper route, but I cannot get it on video. He might have been covered well.
|
|
|