Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 12-21-2006, 04:08 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 13,960
Default Re: Awkward bubble spot

[ QUOTE ]
There is no way -5% can be right. It is -0.9% against a top 25% SB open. Add in the dead 800 and it is easily +EV. That said, UTG would have to be a real idiot to fold this hand. Curtains point is a good one but only if you intend to get the chips in (unless everyone decides to go all-in behind or something crazy). I can't imagine folding being good against two reasonable ranges given the stack sizes. I would def go all-in though as calling has no upside and can only cost us (barring a very unlikely turn/river parlay).

[/ QUOTE ]


I believe there are spots postflop where its clearly correct to not put the chips in.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 12-21-2006, 05:25 PM
fluorescenthippo fluorescenthippo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: on the bubble of life
Posts: 4,498
Default Re: Awkward bubble spot

one reason i like calling is that if SB is a big fish, he is probably checking this flop even if he hits it. perhaps even if he hits it bigtime
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 12-21-2006, 06:50 PM
Gramps Gramps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Checking out this year\'s crop
Posts: 1,649
Default Actual hand

Okay, I tweaked the variables to try and make it really close/tough. The actual hand was quite a bit easier, b/c my relative position was goot - I got to know whether shorty was all-in before I had to put any more chips in myself with big stack on my immediate left, and I had a few chips still if I folded postflop. I guess you can get in some awkward spots still, but as long as I had top pair, I was calling big stack regardless, and as long as shorty was all-in, I was all-in (maybe absent a truly, truly ugly board). With 2nd stack at > 4,000 chips, increasing my chances of 3rd place has tremendous value IMO.

Blinds 120/240
UTG(6,869)
BTN (4,281)
SB(925)
BB/Hero (1,425)

*** HOLE CARDS ***
Hero [Th As]
UTG raises to 840
BTN folds
SB calls 720 <font color="red"> leaving 85 chips </font>
Hero calls 600 <font color="red"> leaving 585 chips </font>
*** FLOP *** [5s 5h Td]
SB checks
Hero checks
UTG checks
*** TURN *** [5s 5h Td] [2h]
SB checks
BB checks
UTG checks
*** RIVER *** [5s 5h Td 2h] [9c]
SB bets 85, and is all in
Hero calls 85
UTG folds
*** SHOW DOWN *** (in white)
<font color="white"> SB shows [9s Qs] (two pair, Nines and Fives)
Hero shows [Th As] (two pair, Tens and Fives)
Hero wins the pot (2,690) with two pair, Tens and Fives </font>

Oh yeah, and I agree with the point that if you're shorty (in the tweaked variables example) this is why you raise short of all-in, it is a good deterrent to getting in a 3-way pot for your life. Heck, even if I have AA or KK, there's a number of spots where I don't want a 3-way pot in a 50/30/20 payout structure. There's a reason why many players do this, it is effective.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12-21-2006, 07:04 PM
sebbb sebbb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 970
Default Re: Actual hand

thank you for making that hand up, it opened some exciting opportunities for my game
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 12-21-2006, 07:40 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: Actual hand

[ QUOTE ]
Okay, I tweaked the variables to try and make it really close/tough. The actual hand was quite a bit easier, b/c my relative position was goot - I got to know whether shorty was all-in before I had to put any more chips in myself with big stack on my immediate left, and I had a few chips still if I folded postflop. I guess you can get in some awkward spots still, but as long as I had top pair, I was calling big stack regardless, and as long as shorty was all-in, I was all-in (maybe absent a truly, truly ugly board). With 2nd stack at &gt; 4,000 chips, increasing my chances of 3rd place has tremendous value IMO.

Blinds 120/240
UTG(6,869)
BTN (4,281)
SB(925)
BB/Hero (1,425)

*** HOLE CARDS ***
Hero [Th As]
UTG raises to 840
BTN folds
SB calls 720 <font color="red"> leaving 85 chips </font>
Hero calls 600 <font color="red"> leaving 585 chips </font>
*** FLOP *** [5s 5h Td]
SB checks
Hero checks
UTG checks
*** TURN *** [5s 5h Td] [2h]
SB checks
BB checks
UTG checks
*** RIVER *** [5s 5h Td 2h] [9c]
SB bets 85, and is all in
Hero calls 85
UTG folds
*** SHOW DOWN *** (in white)
<font color="white"> SB shows [9s Qs] (two pair, Nines and Fives)
Hero shows [Th As] (two pair, Tens and Fives)
Hero wins the pot (2,690) with two pair, Tens and Fives </font>

Oh yeah, and I agree with the point that if you're shorty (in the tweaked variables example) this is why you raise short of all-in, it is a good deterrent to getting in a 3-way pot for your life. Heck, even if I have AA or KK, there's a number of spots where I don't want a 3-way pot in a 50/30/20 payout structure. There's a reason why many players do this, it is effective.

[/ QUOTE ]

How is SB all in? Do you mean UTG finally bet and SB folded for 85 more on the river? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 12-21-2006, 08:27 PM
Gramps Gramps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Checking out this year\'s crop
Posts: 1,649
Default Re: Actual hand

[ QUOTE ]
*** RIVER *** [5s 5h Td 2h] [9c]
SB bets 85, and is all in
Hero calls 85
UTG folds

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12-22-2006, 02:24 AM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: Actual hand

How is SB all in for 85 more when he had 7089 to start the hand?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 12-22-2006, 02:27 AM
sebbb sebbb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 970
Default Re: Actual hand

reread the hand history, SB starts with 925 here
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 12-22-2006, 02:43 AM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: Actual hand

Oh. I thought we were still on the original hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.