|
|
#11
12-20-2006, 12:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $60: low pp in early level after raise
With no reads on any of the players --
pot is T630, T120 to call. And your call closes the betting. Folding post-flop won't cripple you. I'd call here. Better than 5-1 pot odds, if you flop a 5, your set is fairly well disguised (assuming you have a plan, depending on the flop). Something like A,Q,5 rainbow, could be majorly huge. I'd take the shot. 
|
|
#12
12-20-2006, 12:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60: low pp in early level after raise
Bluefeet,
Bold. I'll make an equally bold claim: I disagree and think it's increasingly +EV with each subsequent caller. Ok, someone do math for the job nits now please. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
|
#13
12-20-2006, 12:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60: low pp in early level after raise
Generally i'm folding all small pairs unless there will be 2+ callers and the raise is tiny.
I stacked 3 people yesterday 1st hand of a $33 with 55 [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
12-20-2006, 03:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60: low pp in early level after raise
i totally get what bluefeet is saying, but dont think it has as big an impact as what wiggs is saying...
i do think you lose some ev with every extra player that takes the flop in that there are more ways to get stacked, but you more than make up that ev with that chance of stacking him, especially since we play better... more limpers = better.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
