Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-20-2006, 01:27 PM
cdutilb cdutilb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 174
Default Re: An awkward moment of Clinton support

[ QUOTE ]
If you were to put clinton on a spectrum from left to right, he is further to the right of almost all democrats . Seems like you guys should have considered him a step in the right direction for democrats. So why do you right wingers hate on him so much? Cause he was so successful?

[/ QUOTE ]

That is why he was sucessful. Considering some of the dreadful presidents we have had recently (GWB, Bush SR, Carter, and Nixon) Clinton actually was pretty good. When you don't do much its hard to screw things up. His biggest accomplishment was the welfare reform but the only reason he signed that was because it was an election year.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-20-2006, 01:31 PM
Bicycles_Biatch Bicycles_Biatch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Paying Attention
Posts: 2,657
Default Re: An awkward moment of Clinton support

[ QUOTE ]


That is why he was sucessful. Considering some of the dreadful presidents we have had recently (GWB, Bush SR, Carter, and Nixon) Clinton actually was pretty good.

[/ QUOTE ]

See above post.

[ QUOTE ]


When you don't do much its hard to screw things up. His biggest accomplishment was the welfare reform but the only reason he signed that was because it was an election year.

[/ QUOTE ]

I total forgot about the welfare reform. I'm not being synical here... but does anyone have any links / facts about this reform.

I tried googling it...but I'm not coming up with much current info.

I want to do some evaluation / see some stats to see if Clinton got this right... my guess is yes. Clinton did do some descent stuff when it was election year.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-20-2006, 01:41 PM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: An awkward moment of Clinton support

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


That is why he was sucessful. Considering some of the dreadful presidents we have had recently (GWB, Bush SR, Carter, and Nixon) Clinton actually was pretty good.

[/ QUOTE ]

See above post.

[ QUOTE ]


When you don't do much its hard to screw things up. His biggest accomplishment was the welfare reform but the only reason he signed that was because it was an election year.

[/ QUOTE ]

I total forgot about the welfare reform. I'm not being synical here... but does anyone have any links / facts about this reform.

I tried googling it...but I'm not coming up with much current info.

I want to do some evaluation / see some stats to see if Clinton got this right... my guess is yes. Clinton did do some descent stuff when it was election year.

[/ QUOTE ]

the jury is stll out
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-20-2006, 03:54 PM
Bicycles_Biatch Bicycles_Biatch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Paying Attention
Posts: 2,657
Default Re: An awkward moment of Clinton support

[ QUOTE ]
the jury is stll out

[/ QUOTE ]

thanks for the link... i think it's a step in the right direction. Thank god Clinton was starting to lose some of his middle ground supporters and thus had to get this bill passed.

For my money... here's the part of the article I like most:


(2) it placed a lifetime limit of no more than 60 months of benefits paid by federal funds

My thought is if you can't get your shiat together in 5 years... you don't deserve my tax-dollars.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-20-2006, 05:11 PM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: An awkward moment of Clinton support

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
the jury is stll out

[/ QUOTE ]

thanks for the link... i think it's a step in the right direction. Thank god Clinton was starting to lose some of his middle ground supporters and thus had to get this bill passed.

For my money... here's the part of the article I like most:


(2) it placed a lifetime limit of no more than 60 months of benefits paid by federal funds

My thought is if you can't get your shiat together in 5 years... you don't deserve my tax-dollars.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unfortunately I dont think that leads to anything other than shifting payments to the states. It comes down the proverbial "give them a fishing pole or a fish", complicated by the fact that there is no discouragement of attempts to qualify for more fish, instead of better bait.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.