#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($55) 18 person SNG 1st hand - value within shark scope??
check preflop
check/fold flop don't try to "outplay" these guys. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($55) 18 person SNG 1st hand - value within shark scope??
PF is gross.
The bluff is crappy too, for reasons stated better than i could by others. Check/fold. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($55) 18 person SNG 1st hand - value within shark scope??
zoobird : I think that genarally 18 man T are not STT and do not belong to this forum.
Fold pre-tournament. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($55) 18 person SNG 1st hand - value within shark scope??
Rex,
they play pretty similarly plus i'd rather ask my dog for poker advice than the MTT forum. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($55) 18 person SNG 1st hand - value within shark scope??
18 man tourneys should go here IMO.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($55) 18 person SNG 1st hand - value within shark scope??
Pf is awful it's a huge leak and is a giant spew. On the flop just fold don't bluff calling stations.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($55) 18 person SNG 1st hand - value within shark scope??
This is horrible because of your read as opposed to the opposite. The only time this is even possibly a reasonable play is if the button is a big winning player who would often be testing you with air here and could fold that air. Even then, it probably sucks.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($55) 18 person SNG 1st hand - value within shark scope??
Thanks for all the replys. I liked the arguments made - the whole don't bluff the fish and stick to the normal 2+2 game/style (which is how I play the 9 man's as I said earlier, but I digress) is definitely one reason that plays like this are not highly suggested.
Maybe I am a total luckbox and idiot, but villain thought for awhile and called with Q8, and he didnt improve. I guess -43% players don't even need K high to call?!? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($55) 18 person SNG 1st hand - value within shark scope??
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe I am a total luckbox and idiot, but villain thought for awhile and called with Q8, and he didnt improve. I guess -43% players don't even need K high to call?!? [/ QUOTE ] looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool....reme mber when i said in my thread that i was called with Jack-high...evidence is evidence and stays evidence...loooool NH...would you mind to give us the SN of the player? |
|
|