Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2006, 04:38 PM
derosnec derosnec is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mmmmm chickfila
Posts: 6,159
Default Niche theory

From this month's 2+2 Magazine article on Poker Finance:

[ QUOTE ]
The secret to consistently good cash game results is not beating other players one-on-one, it's figuring out the soft spots at the table and picking one of them. Even with all top players at the table, you'll find these spots. For example, the tightest loose player makes money much more easily than any of the tight or other loose players. There are tables at which a niche such as aggressive preflop raiser, Ax player, semi-bluffer, is unoccupied; in fact there are too many possible niches for all of them to be occupied. Playing in an empty niche lets you pick up lots of chips unopposed. Playing in a niche with lots of other players means you have to fight for every chip.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've been experimenting with this.

Thoughts? Relevant/irrelevant to our games?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2006, 04:40 PM
Marshall28 Marshall28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 740
Default Re: Niche theory

i'd say that its not too much of an important concept at microstakes cuz the whole table is full of "niche's" so we dont really have to identify them, we just know.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2006, 04:57 PM
jmillerdls jmillerdls is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,704
Default Re: Niche theory

I'm not good enough to come close to exploiting this...Might be more helpful in the higher stakes forums.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-14-2006, 05:11 PM
Keyser. Keyser. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: cr blog!
Posts: 4,870
Default Re: Niche theory

In practice I really don't think this concept applies. Each specific niche isn't nearly as a defined as he makes it out to be. An aggressive preflop player will also occasionaly make semi-bluffs, play Ax, etc. Also you'd have to be at the same table with the same players for a very significant number of hands for you to really carve out a niche.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-14-2006, 06:11 PM
EnderIII EnderIII is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 280
Default Re: Niche theory

This seems really interesting.

I'm primarily a tourney player, so the example that comes to mind from that area is when many players are trying to steal the blinds preflop, it is no longer as easy to do so since the entire table collectively stands up to them (or you just have fewer first in opportunities) so that it then becomes good to readjust and become a restealer. But if there wasn't lots of stealing going on, you wouldn't have the possibility of filling that niche.

I've been trying to see how tourney related skills would apply to cash games and this post makes me realize that since i've been playing in games where there is not a lot of preflop raising, there isn't much of an opportunity to resteal (since most preflop raises do not seem to be steals).

Also it seems that in blind vs. blind battles, people are much less frisky in comparision to tournaments, so when those do crop up, a little aggression seems to pick up a virtually uncontested money. This seems like a niche that you are only competing against the players to your immediate left and right, so will be easy to quickly assess and depending on the game, might be enough to let you be on a virtual free roll, since you'll be picking up blind money often enough.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.