#131
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
Dude, OOT knows drama better than TNT, so we eat this [censored] up [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
[ QUOTE ]
This one is the worst, considering what Ed has done for poker in the past [/ QUOTE ] I'm curious what Ed's done for poker. |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
If we'd been pointed to this blog post absent any Ed/Elaine context, I think people would still be pretty rofl about it. It's insane.
WRT: "I'm curious what Ed's done for poker." SSHE was a fantastic book and it helped a lot of us make a lot of money. |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
I agree with the majority opinion that Elaine was often hostile, over-opinionated and sometimes illogical, but I find the presumptions about Ed and Elaine's marriage in this thread entirely out of order, and far more personal and spiteful than anything either one of them ever posted.
|
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
FWIW, I think the OP by Evan was fine, and there were some good points. But it got petty, venomous and repetitively boring (the Ferris thing was very funny though).
Has anyone got the suspicion that Elaine is probably laughing at OOT about this? If she posts more provocative stuff in the days to come, I'll guess it'll become obvious. |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
[ QUOTE ]
Has anyone got the suspicion that Elaine is probably laughing at OOT about this? If she posts more provocative stuff in the days to come, I'll guess it'll become obvious. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmm, strange, your previous post before these last two stated "this is my last post in this thread", yet you deleted that comment and made two more posts. You really do suck at this game. |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
[ QUOTE ]
Has anyone got the suspicion that Elaine is probably laughing at OOT about this? If she posts more provocative stuff in the days to come, I'll guess it'll become obvious. [/ QUOTE ] If she is, she's only helping 2+2 by driving up page hits and advertising dollars. Unless this is all an elaborate dramabomb scheme concocted by DS and EM/EV in the first place. Which would actually be pretty cool. |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
[ QUOTE ]
Has anyone got the suspicion that Elaine is probably laughing at OOT about this? If she posts more provocative stuff in the days to come, I'll guess it'll become obvious. [/ QUOTE ] People that publicly leave this forum in somewhat of a fussy and then continue to take an interest in what goes one here can only be laughed at. |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, I think the OP by Evan was fine, and there were some good points. But it got petty, venomous and repetitively boring (the Ferris thing was very funny though). Has anyone got the suspicion that Elaine is probably laughing at OOT about this? If she posts more provocative stuff in the days to come, I'll guess it'll become obvious. [/ QUOTE ] I would hope she is. I don't see why anyone wouldn't. There's nothing remotely private, secret, or serious about any of this. It's a public blog fer crissake! |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cross-interwebs bashing c/o Elaine (Sklansky\'s 16 year old)
For additional meta thinking, what if diebitter is in fact a paid forum "villain"? Although its not clear to me what financial gain could be had from his generating massive amounts of hatred and antipathy at this point in time.
|
|
|