|
|
#1
12-13-2006, 03:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
OT .... ALL PS-55p5 players, (and other)
What are your thoughts on the 18 man 60's?
Better or worse payout for the money compared to the greater precentage of player to beat? all thoughts???????? 
|
|
#2
12-13-2006, 03:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT .... ALL PS-55p5 players, (and other)
They're softer in general, but it takes a while to get the skill down. They're sort of like an MTT at the end. More variance obv. And they don't go off that often sometimes.
Also stupid-ass Stars makes the HHs look just like a regular $60. So my Tourney Manager stats are all fried out from playing those things. I have to enter all my results with them manually, and it's still fried because of all the ones I dont make the money in that tourney manager has an error on, or thinks is a 9-man. I had to get a summary file from PS to find out my ROI over my last few K $60s. Haven't loaded it up in Excel and parsed it out yet.
|
|
#3
12-13-2006, 04:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT .... ALL PS-55p5 players, (and other)
I play them fairly often. They don't go nearly as often as the 9 mans, so you can't play them exclusively. I see fewer regulars. My ROI is 2% higher than at the regular 55s, but sample size is probably too small to mean anything.
|
|
#4
12-13-2006, 04:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT .... ALL PS-55p5 players, (and other)
I can't answer your question, but I might start trying these out. Anything is better than running worse than any other 60 player alive. How often do they fill?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
