Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-11-2006, 12:03 PM
Befolder Befolder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Heading back to black
Posts: 2,311
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

[ QUOTE ]
I go with a call-call-call line here, usually.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep. Gets most when we're ahead and they'll fold to our raise, lose least when we're behind.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-11-2006, 08:04 PM
lstephen666 lstephen666 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 56
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

Is WA/WB appropriate for this situation?

Either he has a better Ace (maybe 2pr), or he's got a King and thinks we were trying to steal and have nothing (or he likes his King, and is not thinking what we have)

Are both equally likely?

I can see a good case for WB more than WA. KQ is worrying as is any A.

I did shutdown and go for a cheap showdown. It's good to see others taking that type of line also.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-12-2006, 05:34 AM
Sigurd Sigurd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,012
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

I don't really worry about hands like AK, AQ and KQ. Villain would have 3-bet preflop if holding one of those.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-12-2006, 11:33 AM
threads13 threads13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: thread13.com
Posts: 2,681
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

If we call isn't that giving SB the odds to call with middle or bottom pair? However, most of the time he will be drawing to less that 5 outs(right?) and therefore making a mistake in calling. Is this the principle behind calling here(along with what has already been added)?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-12-2006, 12:01 PM
ablick ablick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 57
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

It’s odd that he called your flop raise and then came out betting on the turn? If he’s got KQ or JT, why not check/raise the turn, because you’ll most likely bet if BB checks? So although this really looks that Q helped him, I would still be quite tempted to call him down.

I liked your raise preflop. A5o is favorite against two random hands.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-12-2006, 09:09 PM
lstephen666 lstephen666 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 56
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

[ QUOTE ]
I don't really worry about hands like AK, AQ and KQ. Villain would have 3-bet preflop if holding one of those.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree to a certain extent, but I think this may be giving our opponents too much credit (by assuming our opponents think like we do). At this level I have seen players limp with these hands, so I can discount a little, but I think I'd limp here a fair bit with KQ (but I may be wrong to do that).

I'm also not as worried about AQ or AK as something like AT or A9.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-12-2006, 09:14 PM
lstephen666 lstephen666 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 56
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

[ QUOTE ]
If we call isn't that giving SB the odds to call with middle or bottom pair? However, most of the time he will be drawing to less that 5 outs(right?) and therefore making a mistake in calling. Is this the principle behind calling here(along with what has already been added)?

[/ QUOTE ]

SB would be getting 8:1. 5 outs gives him 8.2:1, so he would be calling incorrectly.

I did think about this, but my read was that SB was as likely to call two as one. I really don't think he was folding a King and was probably even calling two with a 3, so I really think he missed completely here.

Given that he switched between maniac and calling station a fold really surprised me. Even a 3-bet with air I thought was more likely [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

I've read the response as we want to call to keep the pot small. We're not making anything here by betting the whole way, as worse hands probably aren't calling us all the way. So calling makes the most when we're ahead (when BB continues to bet), and loses least when we're behind (by not getting raised/3-bet anywhere).
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-12-2006, 09:26 PM
threads13 threads13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: thread13.com
Posts: 2,681
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

[ QUOTE ]

SB would be getting 8:1. 5 outs gives him 8.2:1, so he would be calling incorrectly.


[/ QUOTE ]

If we are going to get this exact on splitting hairs... lets nail down the odds killa! He is getting 8.4:1 on the flop! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

My real point is...
I generally think of 5 outs as 8:1(therefore SB's best case scenario would be break-even) because we are talking about a pretty inexact science here when it comes to out counting. I could be wrong though!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-12-2006, 10:00 PM
Point Blank Point Blank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,843
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

[ QUOTE ]
I don't really worry about hands like AK, AQ and KQ. Villain would have 3-bet preflop if holding one of those.

[/ QUOTE ]

I lot of villian's don't ... of course they are mostly all retards [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] ... and the type to donk top pair
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-12-2006, 10:38 PM
lstephen666 lstephen666 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 56
Default Re: Ace/rag on the button

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

SB would be getting 8:1. 5 outs gives him 8.2:1, so he would be calling incorrectly.


[/ QUOTE ]

If we are going to get this exact on splitting hairs... lets nail down the odds killa! He is getting 8.4:1 on the flop! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

My real point is...
I generally think of 5 outs as 8:1(therefore SB's best case scenario would be break-even) because we are talking about a pretty inexact science here when it comes to out counting. I could be wrong though!

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Sorry, didn't mean to be picky about the odds. I just wanted to check myself that he would be making a mistake in calling.

I think you make a good point about how we want others to make a mistake and I thought that if this SB was going to make the mistake of calling one, he would also call two.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.