Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2006, 04:35 PM
6471849653 6471849653 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 471
Default Magic and the Stabilizing Lose

Stabilizing Lose is my latest argument against science in favor of magic. This starts by winning an amount big enough and having the 'need' to stabilize it, that generally happens when one haven't been making much if any money during the couple sessions before that.

Now, the odds to get a stabilizing win is like 33%, and a stabilizing draw another 33%, there being just a 33% chance that one will lose something significant. But according to my observations it happens over 66% of the time that one loses (more one needs the stabilizing win the more often one loses). I can be even more accurate than that and say that the lose amount will be between 45% and 72.5% of the win amount that one wanted to get 'stable.'

But time after time I will have to see a different type of formula, a formula that I am very familiar with as it's around 80% of the time the same, going the same patterns as one period, from the beginning to the ends of any period. That's not science but magic.

The stabilizing lose being just one of the patterns and nothing of it is scientific; it's a magical pattern, and only in the long run the mathematical patters more or less get to the right score, but it's only because of magic. One thing I have accepted from much part is the magical pattern, that it's the only reality inside the long run statistics.

Things that happen on the poker table are some of the time following statistics but one must get used to the magical shuffle as the true reality of life and play under its influence and trust that it will be finally leading to scientific end though the path haven't been more than partly scientific.

I though do have my ways of playing at right times and change sites to avoid the bad magic, and it works like 50% and often more, so it may be mandatory, though then on the other hand I have seen that what I leave behind will try to catch me, so it's not fully possible, but this is one aspect where one may earn more than what's scientifically possible.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2006, 04:36 PM
DJ_Northstar DJ_Northstar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 526
Default Re: Magic and the Stabilizing Lose

how much time did you waste writing this post?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2006, 04:37 PM
rokstedy rokstedy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: State of total disbelief
Posts: 819
Default Re: Magic and the Stabilizing Lose

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2006, 04:57 PM
jkkkk jkkkk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: being run over
Posts: 4,454
Default Re: Magic and the Stabilizing Lose

I'm not fussy, ship the good magic, thx.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.