Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Software
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2006, 07:42 PM
Genejo Genejo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 76
Default Moving from FTP to UB- thoughts? (PT, rakeback, GT+)

Since I'm not receiving any rakeback from FTP I'd like to make the switch to UB and I'd like to hear some opinions on it.

How well does it work with Pokertracker? Is it automatic like FTP? And does anyone use Gametime+ with it, or do I have to just register PAHud?

I'm already assuming the player base is much smaller than FTP, but as long as its not as bad as Bodog (I play SSLHE) then it should be fine. How many tables can you play?

Thanks in advance, I've done my own research on some of the topics but I'd really like to hear what ppl here think about switching to UB.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2006, 09:58 PM
checkmate36 checkmate36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: This is not a gambling website
Posts: 2,957
Default Re: Moving from FTP to UB- thoughts? (PT, rakeback, GT+)

I just started playing on UB and everytime I play 2 tables, they stop importing into PT.

If I play one table, I have to close the hand history window every 3-4 hands or else it stops importing into PT.

I tried 2 tables, closing the HH window for each table, but the hands stopped importing after an orbit or so.

Im unable to get PAHUD to work properly with PT so Im using GT+. I have read lots of posts on getting PAHUD to work but no luck so far. The stats are always on the wrong players.

GL and maybe others will have better info on making the switch.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2006, 10:58 PM
michaelantoi michaelantoi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 820
Default Re: Moving from FTP to UB- thoughts? (PT, rakeback, GT+)

I tried UB for 4k hands and hated it.

Mining is nowhere as easy as FTP.

Main reason I moved is the lack of tables going. Not as much choice as FTP.


PS. there is a fix to the UB hand history problem.
look in the software section.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2006, 10:13 AM
oVan oVan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mushroom mushroom
Posts: 103
Default Re: Moving from FTP to UB- thoughts? (PT, rakeback, GT+)

[ QUOTE ]

Im unable to get PAHUD to work properly with PT so Im using GT+. I have read lots of posts on getting PAHUD to work but no luck so far. The stats are always on the wrong players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Same problem here. GT+ works well but is a less useful program than PAHUD in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2006, 03:12 PM
Genejo Genejo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 76
Default Re: Moving from FTP to UB- thoughts? (PT, rakeback, GT+)

Thats a bummer, seems like a real pain to go thru all that trouble just to get PT to work flawlessly with UB. How do PT/GT+ work with Absolute or Pokerstars? Slightly off topic now but if anyone can lend some info that would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2006, 07:25 PM
Al_Money Al_Money is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 1/2-2/4, AIM in profile
Posts: 3,460
Default Re: Moving from FTP to UB- thoughts? (PT, rakeback, GT+)

For those having problems with PAHUD, make sure you have the latest beta version. That should fix the problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.