Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2006, 05:01 PM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

Villain is multi-tabling TAG.


No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Hero: $218.70
UTG+1: $221.65
CO: $63.70
Button: $173.55
SB: $79.15
BB: $281.90

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is UTG with J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
<font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $8</font>, 4 folds, BB calls.

Flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($17, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">BB bets $8</font>, Hero calls.

Turn: 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($33, 2 players)
BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $18</font>, <font color="#cc0000">BB raises to $51</font>, Hero ..?


His flop lead seems very strange to me. Never seen him do that and it reeked of a bet-3bet.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2006, 05:04 PM
Tupacia Tupacia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Money Long Like Arms on Alonzo Mourning
Posts: 753
Default Re: nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

I really hope your floats are not 55% of the pot all the time. Your floats need to look exactly like your value bets (which should be 75%-100% of the pot on the turn).

I would also raise the flop, as $8 leads into the PFR in a $17 pot are very rarely strong hands.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2006, 05:10 PM
Hince Hince is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Time Mags 2006 Man of the year
Posts: 2,320
Default Re: nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

This is a very weird play... I usually raise the flop bet then fold to a 3 bet. It keeps things straight forward and easy. After he checks the turn I would think he is drawing much of the time, that is, until he c/rs.

I probably fold here without a better read.

Also, bet more on the turn. It works as a combo play. You bluff weak queens, and charge draws.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2006, 05:12 PM
RHoof RHoof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 39
Default Re: nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

Fold. Probably a bluff 15% of time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2006, 05:17 PM
Casper05 Casper05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,566
Default Re: nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

Raise flop or bet more on the turn, and I definately dont hate checking behind on this turn. It will induce river bluffs, and keep the pot small with your 2nd pair. You're only getting one street of value in a hand like this, so it might as well be the river so you can get to showdown.

As played, fold the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-06-2006, 06:05 PM
Hince Hince is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Time Mags 2006 Man of the year
Posts: 2,320
Default Re: nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

[ QUOTE ]
You're only getting one street of value in a hand like this, so it might as well be the river so you can get to showdown.


[/ QUOTE ]

At first I thought this made sense... but what hand is going to call a river bet that we beat? Maybe TT? I don't think we can bet the river, so our play would have to induce a bluff most of the time to make the same as if we bet the turn. And by checking we also represent our hand as weak, and villian is more likely to play correctly (ie. value bet a weak Q). I know this means it may induce more bluffs, but we can make more by betting the turn.

Betting the turn charges draws and may get a weak queen to fold. Since it costs about the same as calling a river bet, and it charges draws, I think it is a superior play.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-06-2006, 06:27 PM
Kurtiii Kurtiii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 286
Default Re: nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

i donīt think he has a Q, with wich Q would a TAG call another TAG UTG raiser in the BB ? Imo the only hands he can make this play with are combodraws, maaybe the nfd and ofc 99,77. I think, like OP, that he tried to b/3b the flop. I give up on the flop a good portion of the time, if he is aggresive and draws are a big part of his range, bet like 28$ on the turn .. ?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-06-2006, 06:31 PM
Kilillan Kilillan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,730
Default Re: nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

what's your screenname niel?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-06-2006, 06:54 PM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

[ QUOTE ]
what's your screenname niel?

[/ QUOTE ]


It's OWnalliliKNED
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-06-2006, 07:02 PM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: nl1/2 too obvious against a semi-good regular?

Meh, I would check turn alot. I don't really agree w. all the raise flop advice, we have a decent hand that can easily hit showdown. If its a pure bluff, fine, but I would rather raise the flop w. air/weak hand like 33 that has little showdown value than JJ.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.