|
|
#21
12-06-2006, 04:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ive been known to have an active imagination
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I hate it pf. [/ QUOTE ] I hate folding to min raises. [/ QUOTE ] I never fold to minraises. 
|
|
#23
12-06-2006, 04:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ive been known to have an active imagination
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I hate it pf. [/ QUOTE ] I hate folding to min raises. [/ QUOTE ] I never fold to minraises. [/ QUOTE ] I eat minraises.
|
|
#24
12-06-2006, 09:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ive been known to have an active imagination
fold here, you don't have implied odds. You need roughly 4:1 to hit your card, 13x4 = 52, his stack combined w/ the pot needs to be AT LEAST 52 to justify a "call"(this is just to break even). But keep in mind that he might not have a high pocket, once you call, action stops when his AK/AQ is on a draw. Then you actually didn't have the implied odds to start with.
People suggests all in. If he is representing AA/KK/QQ, he will call you 95% of the time. Sometimes he probably has AK/AQ. AJ is unlikely, but probable. He will probably fold with those hands to your all in. There are more possibilities for AK/AQ in the deck. Looking at the pot size right now, you would need to be successful roughly 3 out of 4 times to be profitable. And of course, you also have 3:1 chance of hitting your draw. If there is any reason not to believe he has high pockets, an all-in could be easily profitable, assuming the opponent is not a calling station. Unless you got a read on the villian, fold here.
|
|
#26
12-06-2006, 09:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ive been known to have an active imagination
Ed, plz let this one go.
|
|
#27
12-06-2006, 09:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ive been known to have an active imagination
Here on the 2+2 boards, Oh Exalted Mod Of uNL, we have a couple of terms we use to describe players who continue with hands like this after villain's flop bet.
|
|
#28
12-06-2006, 10:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ive been known to have an active imagination
[ QUOTE ]
Are my implied odds there? [/ QUOTE ] no, and that should be how you look at this hand at decision time. pf is fine. I'm curious about the 5x initial raise tho, whats that all about? OT: Christmas avatars rock. LMAO at yours and tufat's. AJ's makes me feel warm, lol.
|
|
#29
12-06-2006, 11:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ive been known to have an active imagination
Not raising on the button after 1 limper with T9s is a horrible play and one that's costing you $$. Calling the $2 is very standard. We have position and we are getting great implied odds and we show people that they can't just minraise us to get us to fold hands.
|
|
#30
12-06-2006, 11:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ive been known to have an active imagination
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Are my implied odds there? [/ QUOTE ] no, and that should be how you look at this hand at decision time. pf is fine. I'm curious about the 5x initial raise tho, whats that all about? OT: Christmas avatars rock. LMAO at yours and tufat's. AJ's makes me feel warm, lol. [/ QUOTE ] 4xBB + 1xBB for every limper.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
