Toughest sites to play at

[petesrun]

I've played at Titan, pacific, mansion and FT.
In order of difficulty i'd rank them;
FT - very difficult, lots of tight aggresive players
Mansion - seems about average, havnet played there lots
Titan - extremely loose and crazy. Lots of maniacs lots of calling stations.
Pacific - again very loose, less maniacs but lots of calling stations followed up with lots of tight passive fish, easy to bluff.

Titan and pacific are easily my favourites, but Pacific's numbers have dropped off lately, maybe to due the US prohibition not too sure.

[Backspin20]

Are you saying US players suck? lol
Both those sites dont cater to US players anymore I assume? And the list grows. BS

[CaucasianAsian29]

[ QUOTE ]
WPEX by far.

[/ QUOTE ]
I have to say that IMO the NL$50 and $100 Cash games are not that tuff compared to other sites. And the 100% is very nice.

[CaucasianAsian29]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
WPEX by far.

[/ QUOTE ]

For those attuned to only beating on LPP fish and using a HUD, then yes.

For those who can find a game , then no, very profitable esp with the RB.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

If you can't multitable on wsex, then open another site play 1-2tables on Wsex and few more on
FT or whatever

[chicagoY]

That's the reason alright.

[simuk]

WPEX was tough even at NL50

[PantherZ]

The sites that cater to RB & HUD players are always going to be the toughest sites. Perhaps that is beginning to sink in.

[DING-DONG YO]

[ QUOTE ]
The problem with WPEX is that it is infested by bots and those are not the standard [censored] versions. The ones operating on WPEX are raking in 20BB/hour. I recorded about 6k hands and the 4 most successful bots are all listed next to each other nicely. All of them winning exactly 66% at the showdown...

I cannot really explain how they can be so successful with their 35/15 VPIP/PFR, maybe they are simply successful at beating other bots.

[/ QUOTE ]

screenmaes plz.