#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
i also think pf is fine in this game.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
Thank you all for your responses. Villain had QJo. I think you guys are right that I should have folded the flop. Also seems like folding pre-flop wouldn't be so bad, as evidenced by the fact that I could get exactly the kind of flop I am hoping for (an open-ended straight) and still have to let it go.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
Also, 67o is severely dominated? I'd think A7 is severely dominated, and while I'm not planning on running through 5 people with a pair of 6's, worrying about an oft-played better 6 (or 7 or whatever) seems a little far-fetched to me. [/ QUOTE ] When you hold the bottom end or middle of a straight; you are dominated. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
I'd fold the flop when it's two back - first, it can be raised again. Second, spiking a nine will be death if someone has QJ. Third, some of your outs may be tainted if a flush draw is out which seems likely. Fourth, you must adjust implied odds downward because it can be raised again. Fifth, a hand like J10 or whatever will have a redraw if you spike the high end of the straight. Just too many negatives..
Jeff |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
fold preflop [/ QUOTE ] Joe T. has taken the Tommy mantra to the max. Tommy's the man, but I don't think folding that hand for 1/2 a SB in a likely 6 way pot can be justified. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
fold preflop [/ QUOTE ] this was my thought when i read the title of the post. it was also my thought after i read the hand. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also, 67o is severely dominated? I'd think A7 is severely dominated, and while I'm not planning on running through 5 people with a pair of 6's, worrying about an oft-played better 6 (or 7 or whatever) seems a little far-fetched to me. [/ QUOTE ] When you hold the bottom end or middle of a straight; you are dominated. [/ QUOTE ] Of course, but can we really start relying on reverse implied odds before we see the flop? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
Of course, but can we really start relying on reverse implied odds before we see the flop? [/ QUOTE ] Then trust me, 7-high w/a 6 kicker is surely dominated. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
what is the cutoff then? 87?98?
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
where the [censored] is nate when you need him??/
|
|
|