Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:05 AM
SparkyDog SparkyDog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: getting lost on the way to BUSTO!
Posts: 786
Default Re: KK, yo.

[ QUOTE ]

ok when did this dude become a super expert that could see into our soul.

[/ QUOTE ]

If DPR can say "that checkraise is gonna hurt" from reading a post, it's just one more level of thinking for this guy to bluff raise, and not unpossible IMO. So I don't think a bluff checkraise is frequent, but when we're talking about a situation the slim possibility plus the fact we lose the whole (large) pot could easily swing this to a check IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:07 AM
Victor Victor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,773
Default Re: KK, yo.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

ok when did this dude become a super expert that could see into our soul.

[/ QUOTE ]

If DPR can say "that checkraise is gonna hurt" from reading a post, it's just one more level of thinking for this guy to bluff raise, and not unpossible IMO. So I don't think a bluff checkraise is frequent, but when we're talking about a situation the slim possibility plus the fact we lose the whole (large) pot could easily swing this to a check IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

dpr is a top player (i think.) most arent top players and thus dont think like dpr.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:09 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DeucesCracked!
Posts: 15,310
Default Re: KK, yo.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

ok when did this dude become a super expert that could see into our soul.

[/ QUOTE ]

If DPR can say "that checkraise is gonna hurt" from reading a post, it's just one more level of thinking for this guy to bluff raise, and not unpossible IMO. So I don't think a bluff checkraise is frequent, but when we're talking about a situation the slim possibility plus the fact we lose the whole (large) pot could easily swing this to a check IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

dpr is a top player (i think.) most arent top players and thus dont think like dpr.

[/ QUOTE ]

What hands do I have a value bet against that you think he plays like this?

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:16 AM
Victor Victor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,773
Default Re: KK, yo.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

ok when did this dude become a super expert that could see into our soul.

[/ QUOTE ]

If DPR can say "that checkraise is gonna hurt" from reading a post, it's just one more level of thinking for this guy to bluff raise, and not unpossible IMO. So I don't think a bluff checkraise is frequent, but when we're talking about a situation the slim possibility plus the fact we lose the whole (large) pot could easily swing this to a check IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

dpr is a top player (i think.) most arent top players and thus dont think like dpr.

[/ QUOTE ]

What hands do I have a value bet against that you think he plays like this?

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

nearly any pair less than k.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:17 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DeucesCracked!
Posts: 15,310
Default Re: KK, yo.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

ok when did this dude become a super expert that could see into our soul.

[/ QUOTE ]

If DPR can say "that checkraise is gonna hurt" from reading a post, it's just one more level of thinking for this guy to bluff raise, and not unpossible IMO. So I don't think a bluff checkraise is frequent, but when we're talking about a situation the slim possibility plus the fact we lose the whole (large) pot could easily swing this to a check IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

dpr is a top player (i think.) most arent top players and thus dont think like dpr.

[/ QUOTE ]

What hands do I have a value bet against that you think he plays like this?

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

nearly any pair less than k.

[/ QUOTE ]

So he bets JTs (or 88), bets it on the turn, then check-calls it on the river? Why?

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:21 AM
Victor Victor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,773
Default Re: KK, yo.

"So he bets JTs (or 88), bets it on the turn, then check-calls it on the river? Why?"

i dont know why.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:23 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DeucesCracked!
Posts: 15,310
Default Re: KK, yo.

[ QUOTE ]
"So he bets JTs (or 88), bets it on the turn, then check-calls it on the river? Why?"

i dont know why.

[/ QUOTE ]

If he were 35/12, I'd agree (or any other number of stats) and I'd bet in a flash. Against this guy, though -- he's at least got preflop play down perfectly and he doesn't play badly enough postflop for me to say that he's a mouthbreather, which I say about a lot of my opposition. Does that count for anything?

I'm a bit amazed that you so adamantly think we're ahead here > 55% when we're called.

Rob
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.