#111
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
Happy Trails, Mike Minter.
|
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
3 SC drives... 21 points
|
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
So uhhhhhh, anything else on TV tonight????
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
Random question...
if FLA beats ARK, who is the fourth at-large team? I'm assuming the three others are Boise State, MICH, and ND. ARK would have three losses, WVU has two losses, with Rutgers still coming. Texas would have three losses, as would Cal. I'm also assuming Louisville wins the Big East. Maybe Rutgers if they beat WVU? Maaaaybe WVU? LSU? I feel sorry for Wisconsin. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
LSU
|
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
I'm hoping Boise is the team that gets to hang a big number up on ND in a BCS game. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
[ QUOTE ]
Random question... if FLA beats ARK, who is the fourth at-large team? I'm assuming the three others are Boise State, MICH, and ND. ARK would have three losses, WVU has two losses, with Rutgers still coming. Texas would have three losses, as would Cal. I'm also assuming Louisville wins the Big East. Maybe Rutgers if they beat WVU? Maaaaybe WVU? LSU? I feel sorry for Wisconsin. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] If Rutgers beats WVU, they aren't an at large, and Louisville is likely in. LSU has a good shot. It is a damn shame Wisconsin is gonna miss out. How much longer is Musberger gonna suck off Quinn? |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
nice run by Quinn
|
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
Memorandum
To: Notre Dame From: The World Date: 11/25/2006 Re: National Championships CONFIDENTIAL 1. HAHAHA 2. Join a conference 3. Play a real schedule 4. Avoid losing to top 5 teams by > 20 points CONFIDENTIAL |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC v Notre Dame thread
good time for Walker's first career fumble.
|
|
|