Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-24-2006, 06:38 AM
ablick ablick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 57
Default Re: NL 50 KQ- Line check

[ QUOTE ]
There's a lot of hands that villain could raise the flop with that you are ahead of on the flop but less on the turn. The turn bet indicates that villain is probably not drawing and has a stronger made hand than KQ.

[/ QUOTE ]

Turn bet indicates nothing. Vast majority of winning players would bet here about 80-90% of time with any hand.

Without any reads, it’s very hard to give right answer to this, but as a general rule, it’s not a big mistake to play conservatively against unknown opponents.

However, I did little math for this. I used PokerStove to calculate different situations on the flop (I didn’t consider the actions on the Turn at all because of the reasons mentioned above). I took all the hands that are possible here and examined how those would do against our K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. I took into account possible amount of different hand combinations and also weighted those hand combinations with factors. I used factors, because some hands are more likely than others according to the action preflop and flop.

I’m not telling exact factors that I used, because I don’t want to turn this as an argument whether my factors are exactly correct or not. I just tried to evaluate how likely is that average player would play these hands like this. I didn’t try to find absolute truth, I just wanted to find some math as a back up for our decision. These figures will show my estimations how often we will loose, tie and win if we would play our hand to the showdown. There might be other possible hands, but those wouldn’t probably change much the results I got.

I estimated that 100% - 70% of the players would play following hands like in this example: KQ and 99.

69% - 40%: AK

39% - 10%: AT, AJ, AQ, KJ, 44 and hands that are on some kind of bluff like mid pair, flush draw and pure bluff hands.

So our Hero will:

Win 23%
Tie 28%
Loose 49%

So I can’t say that folding is a bad decision at all here. Only thing is that why call the reraise on the flop and then check/fold when total blank turns?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-24-2006, 07:07 AM
BombayBadboy BombayBadboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CRAI me a river...
Posts: 1,356
Default Re: NL 50 KQ- Line check

Well, we also fold the tun because there is another street to go. Villain is in position and can play pretty much perfect against us. Valuebet his monsters and check behind the weaker hands on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-24-2006, 07:42 AM
Jigsaws Jigsaws is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: pumalicious
Posts: 3,768
Default Re: NL 50 KQ- Line check

[ QUOTE ]
Vast majority of winning players would bet here about 80-90% of time with any hand.

[/ QUOTE ]
Maybe. Fortunately there's a ton of players who slow down after a flop raise.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-24-2006, 08:09 AM
Hattifnatt Hattifnatt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: FT
Posts: 8,202
Default Re: NL 50 KQ- Line check

This is ok, however a bet of 12 on the turn folding to a raise is woulda been a good play as well on the blank turn.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.