|
|
#11
11-22-2006, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike the Mouth was cold-decked in the 2005 WSOP?
Bump for a useless thread
|
|
#12
11-22-2006, 06:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mike the Mouth was cold-decked in the 2005 WSOP?
[ QUOTE ]
nobody is cold-decked if they make the final table of a 5000+ person tournament. I don't care if at the final table they have a million:1 chiplead and lose the tournament getting it in good everytime. They fell ass-backwards in the luck to make it that far. [/ QUOTE ] I beg to differ. A cold-deck is still a cold-deck.
|
|
#13
11-22-2006, 06:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mike the Mouth was cold-decked in the 2005 WSOP?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Did anyone get past the title and actually read the post? [/ QUOTE ] That may have been what the blog author meant to say, but evidently you and I read something a little more sinister into how he wrote that section. [/ QUOTE ] The blog author, I believe, wsaa trying to qualify the difference between Mike getting set-up/cold-decked (in the modern, non-cheating-connotative sense of the world) by having his KK run into AA as opposed to "Mike Matusow got bad beat to take 9th in the 2005 WSOP" aka a "reinvention of history."
|
|
#14
11-22-2006, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mike the Mouth was cold-decked in the 2005 WSOP?
WSOP is rigged
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
