#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
[ QUOTE ]
To say that many of the people playing high limits are in the top 10% of the IQ world is preposterous. If it wasn't for the idiot trust-fund baby dropping a million dollars a year, there would scarcely be a reason to play in many of the high limit games. [/ QUOTE ] he was talking about people who beat the games. he said it pretty clearly. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] To say that many of the people playing high limits are in the top 10% of the IQ world is preposterous. If it wasn't for the idiot trust-fund baby dropping a million dollars a year, there would scarcely be a reason to play in many of the high limit games. [/ QUOTE ] he was talking about people who beat the games. he said it pretty clearly. [/ QUOTE ] And it's still preposterous. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] To say that many of the people playing high limits are in the top 10% of the IQ world is preposterous. If it wasn't for the idiot trust-fund baby dropping a million dollars a year, there would scarcely be a reason to play in many of the high limit games. [/ QUOTE ] he was talking about people who beat the games. he said it pretty clearly. [/ QUOTE ] And it's still preposterous. [/ QUOTE ] not really. people that aren't in the top 10% are pretty dumb. and most dumb people can't beat high stakes poker. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
Whats the difference between a chess-master and a novice?
They both know how the pieces move in a chess board, and the rules to the game, so whats the difference? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] To say that many of the people playing high limits are in the top 10% of the IQ world is preposterous. If it wasn't for the idiot trust-fund baby dropping a million dollars a year, there would scarcely be a reason to play in many of the high limit games. [/ QUOTE ] he was talking about people who beat the games. he said it pretty clearly. [/ QUOTE ] And it's still preposterous. [/ QUOTE ] not really. people that aren't in the top 10% are pretty dumb. and most dumb people can't beat high stakes poker. [/ QUOTE ] Oh man, I think this thread needs to die. But there is a famous quote in Ohio: "Einstein couldn't tie his own shoes." How true this is doesn't matter. Just here is it relavant. For a humorous look at intellegence at it's best, I did watch a little of the last season of Apprentice, and Mr. Mensa was not very impressive at all. Take for example, a math whiz reads all the books a learns how to play poker, the problem is, he can't read people at all. Although he is in the top ten percent of the world by some definition, he is not well equipped to play this game. Take someone like me, who is good with math and psychology, though far stronger in psycho land, but I failed history, liturature, biology, and triginometry repeatedly. I am definitely not in the top ten percent of the world IQ- wise, but I can play a decent game of poker. Disclamer: I am not presently playing in high stakes limit games, but I will see all you very soon, perhaps by years-end, if all goes as planned, just lurking at the moment. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
[ QUOTE ]
but I failed history, liturature.. [/ QUOTE ] I can't imagine why. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
[ QUOTE ]
For a humorous look at intellegence at it's best, I did watch a little of the last season of Apprentice, and Mr. Mensa was not very impressive at all. [/ QUOTE ] people who join mensa are, almost without exception, douchebags. i'm not sure what's supposed to be surprising here. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] To say that many of the people playing high limits are in the top 10% of the IQ world is preposterous. If it wasn't for the idiot trust-fund baby dropping a million dollars a year, there would scarcely be a reason to play in many of the high limit games. [/ QUOTE ] he was talking about people who beat the games. he said it pretty clearly. [/ QUOTE ] And it's still preposterous. [/ QUOTE ] not really. people that aren't in the top 10% are pretty dumb. and most dumb people can't beat high stakes poker. [/ QUOTE ] Oh man, I think this thread needs to die. But there is a famous quote in Ohio: "Einstein couldn't tie his own shoes." How true this is doesn't matter. Just here is it relavant. For a humorous look at intellegence at it's best, I did watch a little of the last season of Apprentice, and Mr. Mensa was not very impressive at all. Take for example, a math whiz reads all the books a learns how to play poker, the problem is, he can't read people at all. Although he is in the top ten percent of the world by some definition, he is not well equipped to play this game. Take someone like me, who is good with math and psychology, though far stronger in psycho land, but I failed history, liturature, biology, and triginometry repeatedly. I am definitely not in the top ten percent of the world IQ- wise, but I can play a decent game of poker. Disclamer: I am not presently playing in high stakes limit games, but I will see all you very soon, perhaps by years-end, if all goes as planned, just lurking at the moment. [/ QUOTE ] Coudent agree more. Aldo texas holdem is a complicated game, intellegance is realy overrated by some poeple here |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High stakes players
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] Al-DOWNED!!!! |
|
|