Does Pacific suck?

[lefty rosen]

Those games at one time played like low limit games at Party. I swear 15/30 looked like a mirror image of Party 3/6....... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[892King]

[ QUOTE ]
Those games at one time played like low limit games at Party. I swear 15/30 looked like a mirror image of Party 3/6....... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Damn I missed the heyday [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Thank you anyway [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[villafan]

"Does Pacific suck?"

yes

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...page=&vc=1


You should try playing at the Boss Network. There are some very fishy games at 5/10 and up to 25/50 there.

You should also be able to find a good rakeback deal for the sites in the network if you look at the trusted rakeback sites.

[892King]

Ty, villafan.
I'd better try CelebPoker.

[canada_dry]

Stay away buddy. Why play there? Paradise is a site from the past. I predict it'll close within 6 months.

[Piers]

[ QUOTE ]
Re: Does Pacific suck?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. Still 15/30 or above its playable. Below 5/10 forget it.

[ski]

pacific is terrible, they lied to me, their support is terrible, they don't have many games, their rake is horrendous.

The ONLY good thing is they have fish. Not nearly enough fish to make up for their absolutely abbysmal ratings for EVERY other aspect of their site.

[censored] pacific.

[Reef]

That's like asking 'is party support incompetent?'

hint: yes

[Little_blue]

Was by far the bets sight to play in lousy player thinking. The games are not desinged for poker players, very very fast hard to see the river...Larger rake then most other rooms 3 buisness days to cash out ect.

On the other hand they attract gamblers not poker players and it took me a while to relise I wanted to play against gamblers rather then poker players....when they let me play (I'm U.S) found the 5-10 to often be looser then a 2 4 at party.