|
|
#21
11-16-2006, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: straight flush, but no reason to raise
I think the reason i raised on the river was that my mind could not accept not raising hand this strong, not every day you see situations like this.Folding straight flushes is like against the basic principles of poker.Then again, if i had folded and he had shown me As i would have been the prime candidate to the "Fold the Monster" trophy.
|
|
#22
11-16-2006, 02:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: straight flush, but no reason to raise
[ QUOTE ]
Ps. Note I'll probably call if villain pushes as well, just because by principle I can't fold a straight flush. Besides the chat will be worth the 100$...(meh money has little value for me) [/ QUOTE ] I guess never folding a straight flush is not a big leak, but honestly I think if you look at the board, calling a 4bet push here is pretty awful
|
|
#24
11-16-2006, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: straight flush, but no reason to raise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ps. Note I'll probably call if villain pushes as well, just because by principle I can't fold a straight flush. Besides the chat will be worth the 100$...(meh money has little value for me) [/ QUOTE ] I guess never folding a straight flush is not a big leak, but honestly I think if you look at the board, calling a 4bet push here is pretty awful [/ QUOTE ] I know I'm beat if he pushes, but still I'm calling. Just so I can say I lost 100$ with a straightflush vs a royal flush. Just plain old bragging rights (sorta)...
|
|
#25
11-16-2006, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: straight flush, but no reason to raise
lol raise is so bad, but as others have said, i dont fold it :/
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
