|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is the Earth gaining mass? | |||
| Yes, it's gaining mass. |
   
|
94 | 73.44% |
| No way, it's losing mass. |
  
|
20 | 15.63% |
| Earth's mass remains exactly even. |
  
|
14 | 10.94% |
| Voters: 128. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-14-2006, 05:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll on scum threads
somehow it seems that posting scum threads should be verified or validated by a mod before they ruin a reputation. so many times the "where there is smoke there must be fire" mentality clings even when the supposed perpetrator was totally innocent...the fact that someone dind't like you sticks.
|
|
#2
11-16-2006, 07:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll on scum threads
[ QUOTE ]
somehow it seems that posting scum threads should be verified or validated by a mod before they ruin a reputation. so many times the "where there is smoke there must be fire" mentality clings even when the supposed perpetrator was totally innocent...the fact that someone dind't like you sticks. [/ QUOTE ] I've found that negative threads are usually a relatively good thing. If it's a legitimate complaint, it's an opportunity to handle it in such a way that benefits everyone involved. If it's a bogus complaint, the truth nearly always comes out, and that generally makes the original slighted party look good as well. Unless it's a concerted smear campaign, the only ones who have to fear a negative post, are those who really are doing something wrong. I don't know if I've ever seen a negative thread negatively impact a legitimate site.
|
|
#3
11-17-2006, 12:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll on scum threads
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] somehow it seems that posting scum threads should be verified or validated by a mod before they ruin a reputation. so many times the "where there is smoke there must be fire" mentality clings even when the supposed perpetrator was totally innocent...the fact that someone dind't like you sticks. [/ QUOTE ] I've found that negative threads are usually a relatively good thing. If it's a legitimate complaint, it's an opportunity to handle it in such a way that benefits everyone involved. If it's a bogus complaint, the truth nearly always comes out, and that generally makes the original slighted party look good as well. Unless it's a concerted smear campaign, the only ones who have to fear a negative post, are those who really are doing something wrong. I don't know if I've ever seen a negative thread negatively impact a legitimate site. [/ QUOTE ] This is an excellent arguement that I never really thought about. Any other affiliates want to chime in?
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
