|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: If you were facing 7 years in prison would you flee the country? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
121 | 56.54% |
| No |
  
|
93 | 43.46% |
| Voters: 214. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
11-07-2006, 03:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
(Semi-OT) warning: not enough sample size
Not sure I should post here or in the [censored] thread. (mod: move it if necessary)
A friend of mine has ~10% ROI 3 tabling Stars 60 turbo (over 1000 sngs, and ~13%roi over last 500), but he just cannot beat $16t/27t (about 2.5% roi over 600). (no it is not me) Edited: I coached him a year ago how to beat Party $11/22, but his style is significantly different from mine(or basic 2p2 style), and I cannot [censored] beat $60t now. |
|
#2
11-07-2006, 03:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (Semi-OT) warning: not enough sample size
Sounds like he does not know which hands to shove and which hands to lay down as the blinds increase. Obviously a mandatory skill for the turbos. Tell him to review his hand histories with SNGPT after each game.
Why play 60s if you can't beat the lower levels? |
|
#4
11-07-2006, 03:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (Semi-OT) warning: not enough sample size
im coming to the realization that ~5k SNGs is where your stats start to mean something.
|
|
#8
11-07-2006, 04:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (Semi-OT) warning: not enough sample size
Now you know better. You want leaks identified by small sampled ROI? Bah. All are possible with the exception of the absurd '60's are easier'.
I'm a part-timer - but with enough tourneys to understand the normalcy of 600 tourney ROI swings from break-even to 40%+. Silly stuff here OP [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Tell your friend for me: Post hands |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
