#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] shandrax: you're probably a fish. keep donating. [/ QUOTE ] My bad, didn't realize that this section was for the idiots to get some self-confidence back by laughing about others. [/ QUOTE ] check post count before you respond next time to save yourself the embarrassment. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] shandrax: you're probably a fish. keep donating. [/ QUOTE ] My bad, didn't realize that this section was for the idiots to get some self-confidence back by laughing about others. [/ QUOTE ] lol |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
next time you defend 97o to a button raise, ask yourself "what am I trying to flop OOP that I will like?"
(2 pair obv) edit: unless this is minbet, in which case, lol minbet |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
doomswitch, amirite?
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
What are "community cards"? Sounds sh*t.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
the odds of this are 568238476:1.5
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
[ QUOTE ]
next time you defend 97o to a button raise, ask yourself "what am I trying to flop OOP that I will like?" (2 pair obv) edit: unless this is minbet, in which case, lol minbet [/ QUOTE ] 9-7o is the min-cutoff against someone raising with optimal range on the button. Losing to a 1-outer makes it look like a donk-call, but in fact it wasn't. I guess this whole story is a case of rocket science meets caveman and gets busted. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] next time you defend 97o to a button raise, ask yourself "what am I trying to flop OOP that I will like?" (2 pair obv) edit: unless this is minbet, in which case, lol minbet [/ QUOTE ] 9-7o is the min-cutoff against someone raising with optimal range on the button. Losing to a 1-outer makes it look like a donk-call, but in fact it wasn't. I guess this whole story is a case of rocket science meets caveman and gets busted. [/ QUOTE ] YOU MOTHER [censored] |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] next time you defend 97o to a button raise, ask yourself "what am I trying to flop OOP that I will like?" (2 pair obv) edit: unless this is minbet, in which case, lol minbet [/ QUOTE ] 9-7o is the min-cutoff against someone raising with optimal range on the button. Losing to a 1-outer makes it look like a donk-call, but in fact it wasn't. I guess this whole story is a case of rocket science meets caveman and gets busted. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, you're exactly right. Rocket scientist for sure. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
[ QUOTE ]
back to back [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] folded 2 hands, then... [/ QUOTE ] Aha! |
|
|