|
|
#32
10-31-2006, 04:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TPTK vs Rekrul, how\'s my line.
preflop: fold > raise > call. aq offsuit looks pretty but plays ugly, especially in a multi-way pot from the small blind. don't check raise the flop, especially with these stacks. once he calls you, betting the turn is spewage unless your goal is to play a 360bb pot with top pair against a lag who is certainly not clueless.
|
|
#33
10-31-2006, 08:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TPTK vs Rekrul, how\'s my line.
i'd prolly call preflop just because i never get hands as good as AQ and it would be too tempting. Once that flop came though i would be looking for an excuse to fold, not to get allin.
i hope you folded the turn and Rekrul showed JJ. then you would have played the hand literally as bad as possibly on every single street!
|
|
#34
10-31-2006, 08:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TPTK vs Rekrul, how\'s my line.
[ QUOTE ]
OP I re-reaise in the small pf if I'm gonna play a hand like this! On the flop you need to fire striaght out to know where you are. Unfortuantely it appears that your TpTk is "weak sauce and should be folded on the T! I think he shows an OP here alot of the time. [/ QUOTE ] Look, read this board as much as you want... But please for the love of mary don't post filth like this ever again.
|
|
#35
10-31-2006, 08:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TPTK vs Rekrul, how\'s my line.
[ QUOTE ]
preflop: fold > raise > call. aq offsuit looks pretty but plays ugly, especially in a multi-way pot from the small blind. don't check raise the flop, especially with these stacks. once he calls you, betting the turn is spewage unless your goal is to play a 360bb pot with top pair against a lag who is certainly not clueless. [/ QUOTE ] You've done a great job of recreating MDMA's post. Good job man!
|
|
#36
10-31-2006, 09:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TPTK vs Rekrul, how\'s my line.
i don't post on these boards often enough to have offended you, so i am unclear why you really seem to be on my case. i tend not to read other people's posts prior to my own posts so that i am in a better position to offer unbiased thoughts. this is something i encourage all posters to do when offering their thoughts on a hand and i doubt i am the only person who has this opinion.
many people post their comments about hand histories. these comments often overlap. i am certainly neither the first nor the last person to have made a comment about a hand that was made previously. many hsnl threads often get inundated with noise from people who don't fully understand the game. so, i would think that it's helpful for posters to see the same sentiments echoed in different ways in order to help separate the wheat from the chaff.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
