|
|
#11
10-28-2006, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 55 hits set
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As an aside, if Villain were full-stacked would we B3B this flop? [/ QUOTE ] I think it's too dry really. Any good player isn't gonna stack off with much on this flop. True [/ QUOTE ] Why are we assuming he's a good player? 
|
|
#12
10-28-2006, 07:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 55 hits set
[ QUOTE ]
what were you planning to do on flops without fives? [/ QUOTE ] Calling $3 for set value here seems fine. C/f non 5, non straight draw flops absent reads.
|
|
#13
10-28-2006, 08:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 55 hits set
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what were you planning to do on flops without fives? [/ QUOTE ] Calling $3 for set value here seems fine. [/ QUOTE ] I don't agree. In order to stack someone, we need to hit our hand at the same time that they have a made hand, which opponent may not have. I would think against a shorty like the opponent Hero needs to reraise or fold PF.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
