Quick PStars NL100 Question

DougieG · #1 10-27-2006, 07:32 PM

Just moved up to NL100 around the same time Party closed, 5600 hands later I am basically break even, certainly not a fun stretch but not outside the realm of variance. Can anybody chime in on whether or not the PStars 100NL games are tougher now than before the [censored] hit the fan? Thanks.

ImsaKidd · #2 10-27-2006, 07:34 PM

5600 hands isnt a sample size. Get at LEAST 25k IMO.

Being breakeven is okay, you can study your game for free, and you are probably a little profitable with PS VIP program.

I dont play on stars, so I can't actually answer your question, sorry [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

DougieG · #3 10-27-2006, 07:35 PM

Thanks Imsa, I am aware that 5600 hands is absolutely nothing. That wasn't the point of my question. It was simply giving my question some context.

ImsaKidd · #4 10-27-2006, 07:37 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks Imsa, I am aware that 5600 hands is absolutely nothing. That wasn't the point of my question. It was simply giving my question some context.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've heard stars cash games suck, but I imagine this is not true as much at the 100NL level. Stick it out- if stars is getting tougher, FT and Absolute are going to be just as tough IMO.

DougieG · #5 10-27-2006, 07:40 PM

I wasn't considering switching sites or anything, question was more out of curiosity than anything else, not gonna be horribly disappointed if I don't hear one way or the other.

bkellog1 · #6 10-27-2006, 10:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Just moved up to NL100 around the same time Party closed, 5600 hands later I am basically break even, certainly not a fun stretch but not outside the realm of variance. Can anybody chime in on whether or not the PStars 100NL games are tougher now than before the [censored] hit the fan? Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im in the same situation,moved up right as party closed except mine is 15K hands of breakeven NL100

personally, I think more sharks than fish migrated to Stars after party closed, which has led to the games becoming a bit tighter. I bet alot of the former fish on party dont even play anymore, some might think its illegal.

ajmargarine · #7 10-27-2006, 11:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I wasn't considering switching sites or anything, question was more out of curiosity than anything else, not gonna be horribly disappointed if I don't hear one way or the other.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good.

Read posting guidelines.

Don't start crap threads. They clutter the forum.

--aj