thoughts on the switch from party to stars so far - Page 5

microbet · #41 10-23-2006, 05:06 PM

I think pretty much everyone playing on party was doing it because they thought they would make more money on party, mostly because of there being more fish. Now things should be even worse as stars than they were before.

As far as just moving goes, I think there is some adjustment to the software and people might not want to rush into massive multitabling, but the game structure shouldn't matter much at all. If you weren't taking the time to think about stack sizes and the ratios between the stacks and blinds/pot on each decision, you weren't playing well. Personally, I would love it if the blinds just changed randomly every hand.

LesJ · #42 10-23-2006, 05:22 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Personally, I would love it if the blinds just changed randomly every hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you just invent a new variety of Hold Em? That sounds pretty interesting.

Les

DevinLake · #43 10-23-2006, 05:26 PM

Looks like it is difficult to figure out which stacks go with the cards on the table (IOW, who is in the hand.)

BradleyT · #44 10-23-2006, 05:53 PM

Stars is fun.

Over past 1500 SnGs

Level - 75/150
Hand - QQ
Avg Win - $T5
W$SD - 37.50

optimus_prime · #45 10-23-2006, 06:43 PM

Yeah that's the only problem, if you turn the pictures on they line up better, but I prefer it with them off.