50PLO8 full ring KTQ9

[wiseheart]

[ QUOTE ]
I ran the hand 50,000 times and was a winner of about .33 bb/100. The hand cannot be played aggressively, however, computer played the hand from random postion only about 10% of time. If played I would limp and hope to see a flop. GL.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im disturbed by how close my results resemble the
computer model. Its wierd, but this kind of changes
the whole way I look at poker.

Anyways, I would check behind on the turn, because
I want to see a showdown most of the time. Id
probably fold if an A or a diamond that doesnt fill
you up falls on the river and MP makes a PSB otherwise
Id want to call down. Unless you had some reads on
this player, which would change the whole situation.

[poloplayer909]

I check

Man this situation really sucks. Doesn't it seem like your always dealt crap in the BB, then the flop hits you and you're forced to bet?

[davim1]

Depends on the player. If he's clueless, i'll usually fire a pot bet on the turn, because most fish will reraise you there on the flop if they have a full house. The problem is if he does have that ten, then if he has the ace kicker he has you beat. Also, what is the most common card to acompany an ace is this game? Definately a two, giving him a full house on the turn. So it kinda comes down to your read I guess.

[zizazziza]

no problem calling this hand pf. I bet out here. U can check behind on the river if worst comes to worst. if he r/r then u can re-evaluate.