![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the 10-20 full tables play significantly tighter than the 5-10s, meaning more hands with no drop. forget about bb/100 or anything like that, what are the best 4 games to play in terms of max rakeback per hour. are the 5 max tables way better? how about playing 4 table of 5-10 full vs/ 10-20 full?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
obviously 4 tables of HU high limit
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you play hu on 2 tables of 100/200 youll make a ton. Aroudn 200 an hour i think
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
best rates i believe is at 5-105max to 10-205max. 10max tables plays to slow and is divided by 10 players.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
play shorthanded.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
accordind to my pt records at 3/6$ limit:
4-5 handed = 3.2BB/100 150h/h = 4.8BB/hours/table 8-10 handed= 2.3BB/100 90h/h = 2.1BB/hours/table you have to extrapolate for 5/10$ are you able to distinguish maniacs from rock while playing 4 tables? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you play tighter than your opponents you get more than your fair share of rakeback. Of course this really only applies in significant amounts at the lower limits where the rake "taken" is a larger % of the pot.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
If you play tighter than your opponents you get more than your fair share of rakeback. Of course this really only applies in significant amounts at the lower limits where the rake "taken" is a larger % of the pot. [/ QUOTE ] I thought Wsex was contributed rakeback...or am I wrong, is it dealt? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's dealt. They said it was shared initially, but I don't think it ever was.
|
![]() |
|
|