#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl200 6m: QQ gets 4bet by aggro
Guys saying the three bet is big, look at the action. There are two callers before it gets to him. Pot sized would be $43.
schwza - I think this is a call. You're calling $175 to win ~$430, so you need to be 40-41% or so. Given the history and the little extra bit of dead money, and the fact that he's never coldcalling that large a raise with AK, but probably thinks it's ok vs your range, I gotta think he pushes AK. And he has other stuff sometimes too. Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 318,488,544 games 0.344 secs 925,838,790 games/sec Board: Dead: equity (%) win (%) tie (%) Hand 1: 57.6226 % 55.86% 01.77% { QQ+, JhJs, AKs, AhQh, AsQs, AKo } Hand 2: 42.3774 % 40.61% 01.77% { QQ } It's a call by a nose even if you take out the one combo of JJ, but i think the range I ran is much more likely to be too tight than too loose. schwza - look for a pm or email tomorrow. I have a couple ideas. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl200 6m: QQ gets 4bet by aggro
I call and blame it on variance when he has kings
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl200 6m: QQ gets 4bet by aggro
[ QUOTE ]
I call and blame it on variance when he has kings [/ QUOTE ] o rly? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl200 6m: QQ gets 4bet by aggro
Very very marginal situation. I think it's a thin call due to history and other considerations but you aren't making a big mistake either way.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl200 6m: QQ gets 4bet by aggro
It's close. But I think most posters are ignoring the fact that villain raised utg.
However, you're raise looks like a squeeze play, but it's still very very close. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl200 6m: QQ gets 4bet by aggro
I call
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl200 6m: QQ gets 4bet by aggro
This is a call given history. Vs. Unknown, folding is fine.
|
|
|