Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Well, do they?
Yes. 1 8.33%
No. 2 16.67%
U R a dumbass. 9 75.00%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 10-14-2006, 08:26 AM
RunDownHouse RunDownHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 10,810
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

I get a few letters a year. Thos from my grandmother are in cursive, and take me a billion years to read even though they're a page, tops. Those from people younger than my grandmother are printed, and a breeze to read through.

In short, its entirely appropriate that the staunchest defender of cursive in this thread has the username, "Grandma."
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 10-14-2006, 08:44 AM
xxThe_Lebowskixx xxThe_Lebowskixx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indeed.
Posts: 3,784
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

...
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 10-14-2006, 09:03 AM
TheRover TheRover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,910
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

cause I had [censored] else to do during halftime, I wrote part of someone else's post in this thread down in cursive. See if you can figure out which one. Yeah, the camera is terrible.

Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 10-14-2006, 09:07 AM
Lazy Meatball Lazy Meatball is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Night Shift
Posts: 4,758
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

[ QUOTE ]
You people are honestly suggesting that cursive should be completely abandoned? That all handrwitten correspondence, be it a doctors prescription, a love letter, a letter to your mother, etc. should all be written in block letters? It's absurd and it's lazy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you know the number of pharmacy errors that could be prevented by improving the penmanship of doctors? Switching to print would go a long way in fixing this.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 10-14-2006, 09:18 AM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,160
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

[ QUOTE ]
I had no idea this discussion would be so polarized!

[/ QUOTE ]

Its not, its one person (GrandmaStabone) versus the rest of the English speaking world.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 10-14-2006, 09:48 AM
pkr2k5 pkr2k5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 656
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

[ QUOTE ]
cause I had [censored] else to do during halftime, I wrote part of someone else's post in this thread down in cursive. See if you can figure out which one. Yeah, the camera is terrible.



[/ QUOTE ]

close to impossible to read, but the camera is probably partially to blame
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 10-14-2006, 09:59 AM
bwana devil bwana devil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: austin
Posts: 4,617
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

ive read many threads in 2+2. this ranks up there w/ one of the absolute dumbest. people name calling and defending their camp of writing style.

i think ill go outside and enjoy the day now.

bwana
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 10-14-2006, 10:34 AM
captZEEbo captZEEbo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: blog: Oct 23- Diary MD-pt 4
Posts: 6,927
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

[ QUOTE ]
cause I had [censored] else to do during halftime, I wrote part of someone else's post in this thread down in cursive. See if you can figure out which one. Yeah, the camera is terrible.



[/ QUOTE ]jack of arcades!
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 10-14-2006, 11:43 AM
MrMon MrMon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fighting Mediocrity Everywhere
Posts: 3,334
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

I can see a lot of people on this thread live in a little box and can't think outside of it.

1. Handwriting is a lot less emphasized than it once was. I have a 10 year-old who's been through a lot less handwriting training than I was 35 years ago, so chill, it is less emphasized. And they do start teaching them to keyboard at a young age.

2. Learning to write both print and cursive is still useful, as long as it doesn't take an inordinate amount of time. There are plenty of times you don't have a keyboard available, so you need to just down a quick note. Pretty handy to be able to do that, don't you think? Some people will print, some will write.

3. There's an awful lot of "I don't do it this way, therefore it useless" type thinking going on here. Gee, could you be a little more authoritiarian? The world does not revolve around you.

4. Finally, writing is a lot more than about writing. It's a fine motor skill, something that keyboarding is not. It's good training for children and gives them a feeling of accomplishment that keyboarding never will. Watch small children learning to write their names, they are VERY, VERY proud of the achievement. I suspect that those of you who don't like writing actually have poor fine motor skills, therefore it's difficult for you. I could be wrong, but it's a pretty good guess.

Sometimes we learn things for reasons that are not readily apparent. Don't discount handwriting, it's there for a reason.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 10-14-2006, 12:06 PM
SoloAJ SoloAJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois State
Posts: 3,942
Default Re: The Social Cost of Cursive Handwriting

Sorry, I just haven't seen this mentioned (well maybe once) in this thread.

You pro-cursive folk realize that most people don't sign their names in cursive right? They sign it in something that started as 16 cursive letters and deteriorated into a a letter followed by a long squiggly line with a huge line either above or below that mess (depending if they have a 't' or a 'y' in their name)

I understand that some people write in cursive but for the most part it is getting phased out. Beyond long letters, I don't think it saves you much time writing in cursive. And for many people, the saved time writing in cursive just costs the reader time when they can't tell what the hell you're trying to write because it's so sloppy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.