Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2006, 11:52 AM
Sarge85 Sarge85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 2+2 Archives
Posts: 3,121
Default Party Horses

Just saw this in the internet fourm

Lets say Party Poker comes up with Party Horse Racing

I legally fund my Horse account, but then transfer funds from Party Horse site to Party Poker site.

I play Party Poker and make my millions - i then transfer back to Party Horses and cash out via the Horse side.

Thoughts?

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2006, 11:53 AM
fsuplayer fsuplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Guy\'s a pro.
Posts: 7,780
Default Re: Party Horses

was literally about to post the exact same thing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2006, 11:54 AM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: I can hold my breath longer than the Boob
Posts: 10,311
Default Re: Party Horses

The law makes exceptions for domestic operations taking horse racing bets, not for foreign ones which aren't tied into the parimutual sytstem and pay fees to same. SOL on that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2006, 11:56 AM
Sarge85 Sarge85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 2+2 Archives
Posts: 3,121
Default Re: Party Horses

Ok, i think i see what your saying, but hypotheitcally if Party set up a US based Horse Betting platform - but still had the "site to site" transfer options.......

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2006, 11:58 AM
Hock_ Hock_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 828
Default Re: Party Horses

[ QUOTE ]
The law makes exceptions for domestic operations taking horse racing bets, not for foreign ones which aren't tied into the parimutual sytstem and pay fees to same. SOL on that.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wonder if that in itself is a violation of the WTO.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2006, 11:59 AM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: I can hold my breath longer than the Boob
Posts: 10,311
Default Re: Party Horses

Ladbrokes has such an operation. But they also ban US players from their poker games because they don't want that horse racing subsidiary penalized by the government for same. Still won't work.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2006, 12:01 PM
repulse repulse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Draw a card.
Posts: 190
Default Re: Party Horses

everything about this legislation is in violation of the WTO
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2006, 12:05 PM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: I can hold my breath longer than the Boob
Posts: 10,311
Default Re: Party Horses

There is no doubt of that, but it will take years to get a ruling, *if* a country where a site is headquartered challenges it. And a positive WTO ruling will only matter *if* that country has large enough trade with the US to effectively enact retaliatory trade sanctions which islands like Antigua don't.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2006, 12:12 PM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: Party Horses

the carve out for horse racing only applies to the government regulated entities...the tracks, OTB parlors, links to legal vegas sports books etc. A foreign (or domestic company for that matter) cant just come in and hookup horseracing B&M or telephone/telegraph sites.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-30-2006, 12:17 PM
iron81 iron81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Resident Donk
Posts: 6,806
Default Re: Party Horses

What BluffTHIS! is talking about is a recent WTO case. Antigua sued the US in "WTO Court" because Antigua claimed that the fact that the US allowed domestic betting but said that overseas betting was illegal was an unfair trade practice and violated our free trade agreements. The WTO agreed and ordered the US to allow Antigua poker sites to operate.

The problem is, the only enforcement mechanism available is for Antigua to impose trade sanctions on the US. Since Antigua is so small, the Bush Admin told them to [censored] off. If a larger country were interested in pursuing a case in the WTO and threatened a trade war, that might be a means to get the ban lifted.

Linky
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.