#1
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist
this is actually not a surprise to me at all
[ QUOTE ] Francis B. Coombs Jr., the managing editor of The Washington Times, a major media ally of the Bush administration, is described by multiple newsroom sources in Blumenthal's piece as an unreconstructed "racial nationalist" and a hater of blacks and Jews. [/ QUOTE ] not a fluff piece - appears to have first been covered in The Nation and backed up by several sources - including his wife - one more reason why it's time to drop that from your sources of disinformation, righties. have a nice Friday - we'll be talking about Woodward's book all weekend [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] rb |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist
With all due respect, you might find it easier to win people over to your side if you link to a source without a known agenda. When I google his name, the link that you provided is the only relevant hit.
Assuming your premise is correct, what difference does it make if he is a racist? Agreed, the President has made mistakes. However, he isn't running in this election. I am sure it's a good book but do you really think that his failures will effect the outcome of this election to a large degree? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist
this one is even better -
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061009/washington_times [ QUOTE ] The vast majority of people who read it (the Washington Times) don't realize that this paper is in bed with bigots and white supremacists. The Times is a key part of the radical right's apparatus in the United States." [/ QUOTE ] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist
[ QUOTE ]
With all due respect, you might find it easier to win people over to your side if you provide some original thought instead of regurgitating left wing talking points. When I google his name, the link that you provided is the only relevant hit. Assuming your premise is correct, what difference does it make if he is a racist? Agreed, the President has made mistakes. However, he isn't running in this election. I am sure it's a good book but do you really think that his failures will effect the outcome of this election to a large degree? [/ QUOTE ] FYP |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist
Do you have evidence that Cooms filled the paper with his views. To me, that is the most important question. Are these just his personal beliefs, or did he actively promote aborting black babies in WT stories?
|
|
|