Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2006, 09:23 PM
whiskeytown whiskeytown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: waitin\' round to die
Posts: 7,406
Default Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist

this is actually not a surprise to me at all

[ QUOTE ]
Francis B. Coombs Jr., the managing editor of The Washington Times, a major media ally of the Bush administration, is described by multiple newsroom sources in Blumenthal's piece as an unreconstructed "racial nationalist" and a hater of blacks and Jews.


[/ QUOTE ]

not a fluff piece - appears to have first been covered in The Nation and backed up by several sources - including his wife -

one more reason why it's time to drop that from your sources of disinformation, righties.

have a nice Friday - we'll be talking about Woodward's book all weekend [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

rb
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2006, 09:40 PM
steve9789 steve9789 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 1-2 ugh!
Posts: 369
Default Re: Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist

With all due respect, you might find it easier to win people over to your side if you link to a source without a known agenda. When I google his name, the link that you provided is the only relevant hit.

Assuming your premise is correct, what difference does it make if he is a racist?

Agreed, the President has made mistakes. However, he isn't running in this election. I am sure it's a good book but do you really think that his failures will effect the outcome of this election to a large degree?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2006, 09:45 PM
whiskeytown whiskeytown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: waitin\' round to die
Posts: 7,406
Default Re: Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist

this one is even better -

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061009/washington_times

[ QUOTE ]
The vast majority of people who read it (the Washington Times) don't realize that this paper is in bed with bigots and white supremacists. The Times is a key part of the radical right's apparatus in the United States."


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2006, 09:48 PM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Old Right
Posts: 7,937
Default Re: Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist

[ QUOTE ]
With all due respect, you might find it easier to win people over to your side if you provide some original thought instead of regurgitating left wing talking points. When I google his name, the link that you provided is the only relevant hit.

Assuming your premise is correct, what difference does it make if he is a racist?

Agreed, the President has made mistakes. However, he isn't running in this election. I am sure it's a good book but do you really think that his failures will effect the outcome of this election to a large degree?

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2006, 09:55 PM
JackWhite JackWhite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,554
Default Re: Washington Times #2 in charge - racist and neo-eugenicist

Do you have evidence that Cooms filled the paper with his views. To me, that is the most important question. Are these just his personal beliefs, or did he actively promote aborting black babies in WT stories?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.